magnett-automation-core
Workflow Core
magnett-automation-core | Workflow Core | |
---|---|---|
1 | 4 | |
11 | 5,075 | |
- | - | |
3.6 | 5.1 | |
4 days ago | 7 days ago | |
C# | C# | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
magnett-automation-core
-
Another Automation library for .net
Why use a library dedicated to process automation in particular? After having worked for more than 20 years and dedicating so much of this time to make integrations, either with internal or external systems, such as payment gateways, and seeing several strategies from dedicated applications to make these integrations, such as BPM's, ESB's, custom systems, etc., I believe that in one way or another, when that integration was not direct "A" calls "B" but that it had a certain logic "A" calls "B" with the result of "C", or the error control involves transaction rollback, was when the problems began. The code that was in charge of the orchestration often lost that separation of responsibilities between integration (data mapping, security, etc.) and the orchestration of the same. The code lost readability and became difficult to reuse and test, among other things. The creation of this library intends to alleviate all these weaknesses. It covers all kinds of scenarios and allows to have the orchestration encapsulated and tested independently. It also allows the creation of flows as if it were a single service and facilitates the reuse of code, as we can create our own libraries with the definition of our flows. For more details regarding this library, please visit its GitHub page: [https://github.com/LHPiney/magnett-automation-core]
Workflow Core
-
Is anyone suing Windows Workflow Foundation?
I haven't tried it out myself but this library might fit your needs: https://github.com/danielgerlag/workflow-core
-
ELSA · An open source .NET Standard workflows library
This looks suspiciously like Workflow-Core, but they are separate projects.
-
How to make a batch service on FW4.7.2?
To ease orchestration, something like Workflow Core might be useful in reducing boilerplate setup within batch processes.
-
I need to setup a workflow to manage each step within each customer's construction project. Not sure of the best way to do this
https://github.com/danielgerlag/workflow-core or elsa
What are some alternatives?
nodify - Highly performant and modular controls for node-based editors designed for data-binding and MVVM.
elsa-core - A .NET workflows library
CoreWF - WF runtime ported to work on .NET 6
QuartzNet - Quartz Enterprise Scheduler .NET
conductor - Conductor is an event driven orchestration platform
DurableTask - Durable Task Framework allows users to write long running persistent workflows in C# using the async/await capabilities.
temporal - Temporal service
elsa - ❄️ Elsa is a minimal, fast and secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript written in Go
HangfireDemo - F# Hangfire Windows Service on .NET FW
FluentScheduler - Automated job scheduler with fluent interface for the .NET platform.
AsyncAwaitBestPractices - Extensions for System.Threading.Tasks.Task and System.Threading.Tasks.ValueTask