magit-todos VS bufler.el

This is not an exact solution you are looking for, but magit-todos displays todos in magit-status buffers. If your repository is huge, this can slow down magit, so I don't know if you would use it.

This is an idea I've been thinking about for a while, since Bufler reached a point of stability, to use structs to define hierarchies that can be filled with objects automatically. It finally came together in my mind and this is the result (still WIP, but it's working well). I expect to use this in Bufler, org-ql, and some other projects. It could be useful as a "backend" for magit-section, ewoc, etc, similar to how magit-todos uses hierarchical magit-sections (taxy would offer a cleaner, more flexible grouping backend).

Take a look at magit-todos, IIRC it works asynchronously.

No problem, I know that time is limited. There have already been a couple of issues filed about TRAMP, e.g. https://github.com/alphapapa/bufler.el/issues/63 If you last tried Bufler before those issues were filed, maybe give it another try; otherwise, please do chime in on that one when you get a chance.

The package I've written that provides tools for grouping buffers into something like "workspaces" would be Bufler: https://github.com/alphapapa/bufler.el See bufler-workspace-mode. It has many more features which are described in its readme.

What are you trying to convince me about? :D :D :D. To start with I recommended to you to use ibuffer, and I can recommend you even to check up Bufler if you are heavy ibuffer user.

Bufler has a lot of options in how to group buffers: https://github.com/alphapapa/bufler.el

Others have mentioned the awesome projectile, but I think it should be said that Emacs now has built in project.el which has come in leaps and bounds (though probably still lacks some projectile features).

I use project.el alongside consult[1] which has many convenient wrapper functions over built-in ones, like an enhanced `switch-to-buffer` with project support. I am actually using an even tighter integration called consult-project-extra[2].

The most advanced and overkill solution would probably be to use bufler.el[3] which basically allows you to define your custom logic for buffer grouping.

[1] https://github.com/minad/consult

[2] https://github.com/Qkessler/consult-project-extra

[3] https://github.com/alphapapa/bufler.el

It's not designed to work that way, but it's theoretically possible. Especially, when I refactor parts of Bufler to use Taxy, it will be easy to make certain grouping keys non-consuming. See https://github.com/alphapapa/bufler.el/issues/69

Regarding the buffer-switching part of this package, you might look at https://github.com/alphapapa/bufler.el and consider how you could implement it through Bufler.

See also https://github.com/alphapapa/bufler.el Its readme also links to related projects.