mage
Task
Our great sponsors
mage | Task | |
---|---|---|
9 | 113 | |
3,890 | 10,017 | |
0.9% | 4.9% | |
5.0 | 9.6 | |
3 months ago | 3 days ago | |
Go | MDX | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
mage
-
climate "CLI Mate": a CLI library that autogenerates CLIs from structs / functions with support for nested subcommands, global / local flags, help generation from godocs, typo suggestions, shell completion and more
mage being a build tool and climate being a CLI library, a direct comparison probably doesn't make much sense but their parsing (https://github.com/magefile/mage/blob/master/parse/parse.go) seems very similar to what I'm doing for metadata (param names / godocs / comments etc.).
-
Is your makefile supposed to be a justfile?
mage
-
Anyone else doing compiler work in Golang?
https://github.com/magefile/mage but I haven't tried it as am not a fun of make like tools.
-
Do we have a package.json/scripts section alternative in Golang?
I prefer https://github.com/magefile/mage
-
[sema v1.0.0] First Major Version Bump
We now use mage to cross-compile release binaries as proposed by u/g00py3 in this Reddit discussion.
-
//go:generate with ENV variables?
Try github.com/magefile/mage - it's written in Go and lets you write Go to run scripts rather than writing bash inside yaml ;)
-
Mage v1.13 is released - now supports magefiles in a subdir
Mage v1.13 was released as of yesterday. This included a few small fixes, and a big new feature - subdirectory support.
-
Ugly code, improvement suggestions needed
If you need build automation, use mage.
Task
-
Show HN: Workflow Orchestrator in Golang
So many tools in this space! This one looks a little bit like go-task, but it seems maybe better for production workflows because if timeout support, while go-task seems more aimed to command line work/makefile replacement.
—-
https://github.com/go-task/task
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
View on GitHub
- Task: A task runner / alternative to GNU Make
-
Using Make – writing less Makefile
A similar tool is `task` https://taskfile.dev/ . It is quite capable and also a single executable. I've grown to quite like it.
-
What’s with DevOps engineers using `make` of all things?
check out tasks - a bit of a learning curve but arguably more powerful imo
-
Go Development with Hot Reload Using Taskfile
That's when I came across taskfile.dev. Task is an automation tool designed to be more accessible than other options, such as GNU Make.
-
Poetry (Packaging) in motion
Full disclosure, I did not review Conda or Hatch fully. Not that there is anything explicitly wrong with either of them. Conda is too specific to the scientific community for my general taste. Hatch seems to go well with Conda and also uses the PyProject manifest as well. It's nice that it gives you several built in tools, similar to commit hooks, but I tend to like to roll my own via a Taskfile and run them with Poetry.
-
Building RESTful API with Hexagonal Architecture in Go
Taskfile is a tool for streamlining repetitive development tasks. It helps automate activities like building, testing, and deploying applications. Unlike Makefile, Taskfile uses YAML for configuration, making it more readable and user-friendly.
-
We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed
9. We test everything with another promotion which runs make targets which build docker containers to run python scripts (pytest)
This is also built by a complicated web of wildcarded makefile targets, which need to be interoperable and support a few if/else cases for specific components.
My plan is to migrate all of this to something simpler and more straightforward, or at least more maintainable, which is honestly probably going to turn into taskfile[0] instead of makefiles, and then simple python scripts for the glue that ties everything together or does more complex logic.
My hope is that it can be more straightforward and easier to maintain, with more component-ized logic, but realistically every step in that labyrinthine build process (and that's just the open-source version!) came from a decision made by a very talented team of engineers who know far more about the process and the product than I do. At this point I'm wondering if it would make 'more sense' to replace it with a giant python script of some kind and get access to all the logic we need all at once (it would not).
[0] https://taskfile.dev/
-
Exploring GCP With Terraform: Setting Up The Environment And Project
task - a task runner and a replacement for make
What are some alternatives?
Cockatrice - A cross-platform virtual tabletop for multiplayer card games
just - 🤖 Just a command runner
goyek - Task automation Go library
doit - task management & automation tool
taskflow - Create build pipelines in Go [Moved to: https://github.com/goyek/goyek]
goreleaser - Deliver Go binaries as fast and easily as possible
PacketProxy - A local proxy written in Java
boilr - :zap: boilerplate template manager that generates files or directories from template repositories
HattrickOrganizer - Assistant for Hattrick online football manager
JobRunner - Framework for performing work asynchronously, outside of the request flow
symphony-of-empires - Symphony of the Empires is a RTS strategy game and map game.
taskctl - Concurrent task runner, developer's routine tasks automation toolkit. Simple modern alternative to GNU Make 🧰