logica
materialize
logica | materialize | |
---|---|---|
19 | 117 | |
1,680 | 5,580 | |
- | 0.4% | |
9.1 | 10.0 | |
14 days ago | about 13 hours ago | |
Jupyter Notebook | Rust | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
logica
-
Prolog language for PostgreSQL proof of concept
If you're interested in this I would also recommend you check out Logica[0], which is a datalog-like language that is explicitly made to compile to SQL queries.
0: https://logica.dev/
- Logica
- New welcome page for Logica language
-
Introduction to Datalog
> I guess the intention is to be better than SQL but then I was left with "under which circumstances?"
Excellent question.
Two of the most common use cases for databases are "transactional processing" (manipulating small numbers of rows in real time) and "analytical processing" (querying enormous numbers of rows, typically in a read-only fashion).
SQL is generally fine for transactional workloads.
But analytical queries sometimes involve multi-page queries, with lots of JOINs and CTEs. And these queries are often automatically generated.
And once you start writing actual multi-page "programs" in SQL, you may decide that it's a fairly clunky and miserable programming language. What Datalog typically buys you is a way to cleanly decompose large queries into "subroutines." And it offers a simpler syntax for many kinds of complex JOINs.
Unfortunately, there isn't really a standard dialect of Datalog, or even a particular dialect with mainstream traction. So choosing Datalog is a bit of a tradeoff: does it buy you enough, for your use case, that it's worth being a bit outside the mainstream? Maybe! But I'd love to see something like Logica gain more traction: https://logica.dev/
-
Mangle, a programming language for deductive database programming
Interesting; a Google engineer previously published a Datalog variant for BigQuery: https://logica.dev/
This new language seems similar to differential-Datalog (which is sadly in maintenance mode): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33521561
- Show HN: PRQL 0.2 – Releasing a better SQL
-
Show HN: PRQL – A Proposal for a Better SQL
Looks pretty cool. I'd be interested if the README had a comparison with Google's Logica (https://github.com/EvgSkv/logica)
-
PathQuery, Google's Graph Query Language
Oh wow that is neat!
And yes, this kind of thing is why datalog is a lot more amenable to fast query plans & runtimes than prolog. This part is especially cool: https://github.com/EvgSkv/logica/blob/main/compiler/dialects...
-
Thought about Logica: Google new programming language that compiles to SQL ?
Google new programming Language that compiles to SQL (Support BigQuery and Postgres) feels very exciting. Blog: https://opensource.googleblog.com/2021/04/logica-organizing-your-data-queries.html Github: https://github.com/EvgSkv/logica
-
Google Logica Aims To Make SQL Queries More Reusable and Readable
Going to be? It already is. In fact, one thing the article misses is right there at the bottom of the project page:
materialize
-
Ask HN: How Can I Make My Front End React to Database Changes in Real-Time?
[2] https://materialize.com/
-
Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
To fully leverage the data is the new oil concept, companies require a special database designed to manage vast amounts of data instantly. This need has led to different database forms, including NoSQL databases, vector databases, time-series databases, graph databases, in-memory databases, and in-memory data grids. Recent years have seen the rise of cloud-based streaming databases such as RisingWave, Materialize, DeltaStream, and TimePlus. While they each have distinct commercial and technical approaches, their overarching goal remains consistent: to offer users cloud-based streaming database services.
-
Proton, a fast and lightweight alternative to Apache Flink
> Materialize no longer provide the latest code as an open-source software that you can download and try. It turned from a single binary design to cloud-only micro-service
Materialize CTO here. Just wanted to clarify that Materialize has always been source available, not OSS. Since our initial release in 2020, we've been licensed under the Business Source License (BSL), like MariaDB and CockroachDB. Under the BSL, each release does eventually transition to Apache 2.0, four years after its initial release.
Our core codebase is absolutely still publicly available on GitHub [0], and our developer guide for building and running Materialize on your own machine is still public [1].
It is true that we substantially rearchitected Materialize in 2022 to be more "cloud-native". Our new cloud offering offers horizontal scalability and fault tolerance—our two most requested features in the single-binary days. I wouldn't call the new architecture a microservices design though! There are only 2-3 services, each quite substantial, in the new architecture (loosely: a compute service, an orchestration service, and, soon, a load balancing service).
We do push folks to sign up for a free trial of our hosted cloud offering [2] these days, rather than trying to start off by running things locally, as we generally want folks' first impression of Materialize to be of the version that we support for production use cases. A all-in-one single machine Docker image does still exist, if you know where to look, but it's very much use-at-your-own-risk, and we don't recommend using it for anything serious, but it's there to support e.g. academic work that wants to evaluate Materialize's capabilities to incrementally maintain recursive SQL queries.
If folks have questions about Materialize, we've got a lively community Slack [3] where you can connect directly with our product and engineering teams.
[0]: https://github.com/MaterializeInc/materialize/tree/main
- What I Talk About When I Talk About Query Optimizer (Part 1): IR Design
-
We Built a Streaming SQL Engine
Some recent solutions to this problem include Differential Dataflow and Materialize. It would be neat if postgres adopted something similar for live-updating materialized views.
https://github.com/timelydataflow/differential-dataflow
https://materialize.com/
-
Ask HN: Who is hiring? (October 2023)
Materialize | Full-Time | NYC Office or Remote | https://materialize.com
Materialize is an Operational Data Warehouse: A cloud data warehouse with streaming internals, built for work that needs action on what’s happening right now. Keep the familiar SQL, keep the proven architecture of cloud warehouses but swap the decades-old batch computation model for an efficient incremental engine to get complex queries that are always up-to-date.
Materialize is the operational data warehouse built from the ground up to meet the needs of modern data products: Fresh, Correct, Scalable — all in a familiar SQL UI.
Senior/Staff Product Manager - https://grnh.se/69754ebf4us
Senior Frontend Engineer - https://grnh.se/7010bdb64us
===
Investors include Redpoint, Lightspeed and Kleiner Perkins.
-
Ask HN: Who is hiring? (June 2023)
Materialize | EM (Compute), Senior PM | New York, New York | https://materialize.com/
You shouldn't have to throw away the database to build with fast-changing data. Keep the familiar SQL, keep the proven architecture of cloud warehouses, but swap the decades-old batch computation model for an efficient incremental engine to get complex queries that are always up-to-date.
That is Materialize, the only true SQL streaming database built from the ground up to meet the needs of modern data products: Fresh, Correct, Scalable — all in a familiar SQL UI.
Engineering Manager, Compute - https://grnh.se/4e14099f4us
Senior Product Manager - https://grnh.se/587c36804us
VP of Marketing - https://grnh.se/9caac4b04us
- What are your favorite tools or components in the Kafka ecosystem?
- Ask HN: Who is hiring? (May 2023)
-
Dozer: A scalable Real-Time Data APIs backend written in Rust
How does it compare to https://materialize.com/ ?
What are some alternatives?
scryer-prolog - A modern Prolog implementation written mostly in Rust.
ClickHouse - ClickHouse® is a free analytics DBMS for big data
ungoogled-chromium-archlinux - Arch Linux packaging for ungoogled-chromium
risingwave - Cloud-native SQL stream processing, analytics, and management. KsqlDB and Apache Flink alternative. 🚀 10x more productive. 🚀 10x more cost-efficient.
malloy - Malloy is an experimental language for describing data relationships and transformations.
openpilot - openpilot is an open source driver assistance system. openpilot performs the functions of Automated Lane Centering and Adaptive Cruise Control for 250+ supported car makes and models.
prql - PRQL is a modern language for transforming data — a simple, powerful, pipelined SQL replacement
rust-kafka-101 - Getting started with Rust and Kafka
dbt-core - dbt enables data analysts and engineers to transform their data using the same practices that software engineers use to build applications.
dbt-expectations - Port(ish) of Great Expectations to dbt test macros
differential-datalog - DDlog is a programming language for incremental computation. It is well suited for writing programs that continuously update their output in response to input changes. A DDlog programmer does not write incremental algorithms; instead they specify the desired input-output mapping in a declarative manner.