lockwise-android
Waterfox
Our great sponsors
lockwise-android | Waterfox | |
---|---|---|
7 | 166 | |
634 | 3,492 | |
- | 3.0% | |
0.0 | 10.0 | |
over 2 years ago | 3 days ago | |
Kotlin | ||
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lockwise-android
-
Firefox as a Password Manager
For my mobile device I could never get used to using FF as my primary browser, and I started using Lockwise to be able to access all my saved passwords. Sadly though, the app was discontinued, or at least its repo was archived, but I still use the last build they published over at their GitHub project: https://github.com/mozilla-lockwise/lockwise-android
-
End of Support for Firefox Lockwise
For about 6 months or so I had to build my own release of lockwise because they had trouble supporting a point release of Android.
Their repo also hasn't seen any commits for about a year now:
https://github.com/mozilla-lockwise/lockwise-android
-
Firefox Lockwise
Not much activity: https://github.com/mozilla-lockwise/lockwise-android
- Is lockwise death?
-
LastPass free version soon to be restricted to only either mobile or desktop. What are good alternatives?
Shame it isn't on the about:logins page and doesn't seem to be in the mobile app yet https://github.com/mozilla-lockwise/lockwise-android/issues/554
-
One Ui 30 Constantly Showing Null In A Text Field
Found the problem to this issue. It is related to the Auto-Fill Service of Firefox Lockwise. After having installed the latest build from Github ( https://github.com/mozilla-lockwise/lockwise-android/releases/tag/release-v4.0.3 ), the issue seems to be gone. I hope this might help you.
- Null Popup On My Pixel 3a Since Updating To
Waterfox
-
In 2024, please switch to Firefox
> [Monday](https://github.com/WaterfoxCo/Waterfox/releases/tag/G5.1.9),
- Waterfox not opening after updating to G6 on Windows 8.1
-
Slow Browser Issue
With 4GB of RAM I would recommend that you use the ESR version or some lightweight fork like Waterfox that I've been testing these days. Is really lighter and can use Firefox Sync. But it has his problems. I would prefer to go with ESR and deactivating smooth scrolling if I was you.
- Floorp – a customisable Firefox fork from Japan
-
Rethinking Window Management in Gnome
> I wish Unity didn't die
Hi from Unity on Ubuntu 23.04.
I am running the Unity flavour:
https://ubuntuunity.org/
It uses the latest Unity 7.7, released earlier this year:
https://gitlab.com/ubuntu-unity/unity-x/unityx
I run it on 3 or 4 machines, one of which has 2 screens and one of which has 3. Works great, scales well, handles modern Ubuntu just fine.
I use it with the Waterfox browser, which integrates natively with the Unity global menu bar, without any addons or config. I am currently on -- (hits alt-H, A) -- version 5.1.9.
https://www.waterfox.net/
-
Waterfox runaway memory usage, vsize-max-contiguous using all the ram
Post issues on Gihtub for reporting bugs. https://github.com/WaterfoxCo/Waterfox/issues
-
Waterfox or Librewolf ?
I've made sure security updates have now been available ASAP for quite a while now. G5.1.9 released on Monday, for example. This is a day before Mozilla, but mostly because Mozilla spend a day or two doing QA.
-
Firefox ESR 115 confirmed to be the last version of Firefox for macOS 10.12, 10.13 and 10.14. Supported until September 2024.
I've been a fan of Waterfox for some time now
- Comment le gouvernement veut complètement bloquer les sites illégaux
-
Trinity Desktop Environment – a modern KDE3 fork
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1201/extend-panel-men...
Of course, GNOME broke it in a later release. This is why no amount of extensions are an answer: they break. Extensions do not work from one release of GNOME to another, and when they fail, the whole desktop often fails.
> Also, it’s not really Gnome’s fault that linux doesn’t have as great metadata from apps to be able to display the apps’ menubars (unity could do it).
False. Gtk exposes this; Unity didn't have stored metadata on lots of apps, it just displayed the existing controls' contents somewhere else. If you run brand new Gtk apps on Unity today, they get panel menus. This was not some clever hack.
Unity is still around:
https://unityd.org/
The distro is back again:
https://ubuntuunity.org/
Brand new apps, like Waterfox, integrate with it fine although they did not exist when it was written.
https://www.waterfox.net/
> With all due respect, that is bullshit reasoning. Selectively displaying useful things is the whole point of UIs.
I disagree.
1. I want to choose what is shown or not. In order to choose, I have to be able to see it. In other words, it needs to be there at first, and then I can choose whether I want to show it or not.
If I can't see it in the first place, then how am I to know it's there?
It's the users' choice what is shown or not. It is not up to the developer to say "they don't need to see this and I'm going to hide it away."
Any piece of software that does that is user hostile.
> Otherwise why would you roll up your window?
Again: it's my choice. I get to choose. It's my computer. They are my windows. I choose if they are shown or not.
That is the point of free software: Choice.
GNOME says it's free, but it takes choices away from me. I object to that.
> Why do you have menus in the first place that hide their content until clicked?
To save space for my document. You can't show everything all the time: that is why you leave it up to the user to choose what they show and when.
(Incidentally, this is also why in my opinion the Microsoft ribbon based fluent interface fails. It tries to show far too much all at once, and the result is that it wastes a huge amount of screen space, and is actually more difficult to hunt through for what I need when I need it.)
> That is no longer the corner, so it doesn’t benefit from this law at all.
False.
Fitt's law is about target size.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitts%27s_law#Implications_for...
It is not about corners. It is about edges too.
By the way I do have a clue about this stuff... for example here is a screenshot of a piece of software which I designed about a dozen years which makes use of Fitt's Law.
https://twitter.com/SimplicityComps/status/54085863397497241...
> The super key is the same as the windows, or the mac command key.
So, yes, but those environments don't suddenly change your entire screen.
> Also often called Meta.
That is a different key. Meta and super are not interchangeable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_key
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_key_(keyboard_button)
> What’s the problem here exactly? Is alt+f4 written over the screen? Or ctrl+c? Especially that the same behavior is expected from the windows start menu.
The problem here, as I'm attempting to spell out, is that there were existing conventions for this stuff, and GNOME does not respect them.
> It’s a community for its users. You clearly don’t use it nor contribute to it either by work or financially, so it is not really fair to ask someone else to work for you specifically..
No. What I do is, I write about it for a living. I analyse this stuff, I draw comparisons, I point out weaknesses and strengths. That's my job.
In my professional capacity, the GNOME foundation invited me to its GUADEC conference about six or seven years back. I asked a lot of awkward and difficult questions, because that's my job, and I didn't get invited back.
> Literally every OS and distro suck at it.
False. For example, using most other interfaces, such as XFCE, I can treat a multiscreen desktop as one big space. I can have one panel at the far left, and one on the far right, of the entire multi-monitor desktop.
But GNOME doesn't let me do that.
Why not?
> Nonetheless, I feel you are reasoning from a very biased point
Because I disagree with you, you think that I'm biased?
Do you think that everyone who disagrees with you is biased?
Have you considered that perhaps I have opinions, and can draw upon years of knowledge and experience, and make reasoned arguments based on evidence, and that is not the same thing as being biased?
> I don’t think it is as fruitful a discussion.
So because I can counter your arguments with examples and reasoning, you don't think that it's fruitful discussion?
Personally, I think that the arguments where people can defend their points, and produce evidence to back them up, are the most fruitful kind.
What are some alternatives?
KeePassium - KeePass-compatible password manager for iOS
ungoogled-chromium - Google Chromium, sans integration with Google
Bitwarden - The core infrastructure backend (API, database, Docker, etc).
clean-flash-builds - Repository of clean Flash Player builds.
Fenix - ⚠️ Fenix (Firefox for Android) moved to a new repository. It is now developed and maintained as part of: https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/firefox-android
Waterfox-Classic - The Waterfox Classic repository, for legacy systems and customisation.
KeeAnywhere - A cloud storage provider plugin for KeePass Password Safe
iceraven-browser - Iceraven Browser
awesome-selfhosted - A list of Free Software network services and web applications which can be hosted on your own servers
firefox-scripts - userChromeJS / autoconfig.js and extensions
reference-browser - A full-featured browser reference implementation using Mozilla Android Components.
waterfox-deb-rpm-arch-AppImage - Unofficial repository with Waterfox Web Browser packages for Ubuntu, Debian (deb), Arch Linux (pkg.tar.xz), Fedora, CentOS 7, Alma, Rocky and openSUSE (rpm) and AppImage packages for all distros following with CentOS 7.