livebook
datapane
livebook | datapane | |
---|---|---|
80 | 30 | |
4,425 | 1,349 | |
2.1% | 0.5% | |
9.8 | 7.3 | |
4 days ago | 7 months ago | |
Elixir | Python | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
livebook
-
Super simple validated structs in Elixir
To get started you need a running instance of Livebook
- Arraymancer – Deep Learning Nim Library
-
Setup Nx lib and EXLA to run NX/AXON with CUDA
LiveBook site
-
Interactive Code Cells
I prefer functional programming with Livebook[1] for this type of thing. Once you run a cell, it can be published right into a web component as well.
[1] - https://livebook.dev
-
What software should I use as an alternative to Microsoft OneNote?
If you're a coder, Livebook might be worth a look too. I certainly have my eyes on it.
-
Advent of Code Day 5
Would highly recommend looking at Jose's use of livebook to answer these. It makes testing easier. It's old but still relevant. Video link inside
- Advent of Code 2023 is nigh
-
Racket branch of Chez Scheme merging with mainline Chez Scheme
That's hard to say. Racket is a rather complete language, as is F# and Elixir. And F# and Racket are extremely capable multi-paradigm languages, supporting basically any paradigm. Elixir is a bit more restricted in terms of its paradigms, but that's a feature oftentimes, and it also makes up for it with its process framework and deep VM support from the BEAM.
I would say that the key difference is that F# and Elixir are backed by industry whereas Racket is primarily backed via academia. Thus, the incentives and goals are more aligned for F# and Elixir to be used in industrial settings.
Also, both F# and Elixir gain a lot from their host VMs in the CLR and BEAM. Overall, F# is the cleanest language of the three, as it is easy to write concise imperative, functional, or OOP code and has easy asynchronous facilities. Elixir supports macros, and although Racket's macro system is far more advanced, I don't think it really provides any measurable utility over Elixir's. I would also say that F# and Elixir's documentation is better than Racket's. Racket has a lot of documentation, but it can be a little terse at times. And Elixir definitely has the most active, vibrant, and complete ecosystem of all three languages, as well as job market.
The last thing is that F# and Elixir have extremely good notebook implementations in Polyglot Notebooks (https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-dotne...) and Livebook (https://livebook.dev/), respectively. I would say both of these exceed the standard Python Jupyter notebook, and Racket doesn't have anything like Polyglot Notebooks or Livebook. (As an aside, it's possible for someone to implement a Racket kernel for Polyglot Notebooks, so maybe that's a good side project for me.)
So for me, over time, it has slowly whittled down to F# and Elixir being my two languages that I reach for to handle effectively any project. Racket just doesn't pull me in that direction, and I would say that Racket is a bit too locked to DrRacket. I tried doing some GUI stuff in Racket, and despite it having an already built framework, I have actually found it easier to write my own due to bugs found and the poor performance of Racket Draw.
-
Runme – Interactive Runbooks Built with Markdown
This looks very similar to LiveBook¹. It is purely Elixir/BEAM based, but is quite polished and seems like a perfect workflow tool that is also able to expose these workflows (simply called livebooks) as web apps that some functional, non-technical person can execute on his/her own.
1: https://livebook.dev/
- Livebook: Automate code and data workflows with interactive notebooks
datapane
- Datapane: Build and share data reports in 100% Python
-
Polars: Company Formation Announcement
If you're looking for an easy way to build an HTML report using Python, you might find Datapane (https://github.com/datapane/datapane) helpful. I'm one of the people building it! We don't support polars (yet, on the roadmap) but we do support pandas so you can convert to a pandas DataFrame and include your data and any plots, etc.
-
JupyterLab 4.0
If you're interested in an easier way to create reports using Python and Plotly/Pandas, you should check out our open-source library, Datapane: https://github.com/datapane/datapane - you can create a standalone, redistributable HTML file in a few lines of Python.
-
Evidence – Business Intelligence as Code
You might be interested in what we're hacking on at Datapane (I'm one of the founders): https://github.com/datapane/datapane.
You can create standalone HTML data reports from Python/Jupyter in ~3 lines of code: https://docs.datapane.com/reports/overview/
-
Ask HN: Fastest way to turn a Jupyter notebook into a website these days?
You can build web apps from Jupyter using Datapane [0]. I'm one of the founders, so let me know if I can help at all.
You can either export a static site [1] (and host on GH pages or S3), or, if you need backend logic, you can add Python functions [2] and serve on your favourite host (we use Fly).
We have specific Jupyter integration to automatically convert your notebook into an app [3].
[0] https://github.com/datapane/datapane
[1] https://docs.datapane.com/reference/reports/#datapane.proces...
[2] https://docs.datapane.com/apps/overview/
[3] https://docs.datapane.com/reports/jupyter-integration/#conve...
- Datapane – Build full-stack data apps in 100% Python
-
Datapane - Build full-stack data apps in 100% Python
Our GitHub is https://github.com/datapane/datapane and you can get started here: https://docs.datapane.com/quickstart/
- Datapane: Build internal analytics products in minutes using Python
-
Datapane - Build internal data products in 100% Python
Thanks a lot! Yes, absolutely, a few people have brought this up and working working on removing the header right now. If I can help at all, feel free to reach us on GH Discussions: https://github.com/datapane/datapane/discussions
- Datapane/datapane: Build full-stack data analytics apps in Python
What are some alternatives?
kino - Client-driven interactive widgets for Livebook
streamlit - Streamlit — A faster way to build and share data apps.
awesome-advent-of-code - A collection of awesome resources related to the yearly Advent of Code challenge.
dash - Data Apps & Dashboards for Python. No JavaScript Required.
interactive - .NET Interactive combines the power of .NET with many other languages to create notebooks, REPLs, and embedded coding experiences. Share code, explore data, write, and learn across your apps in ways you couldn't before.
jupyter-dash - OBSOLETE - Dash v2.11+ has Jupyter support built in!
Genie.jl - 🧞The highly productive Julia web framework
perspective - A data visualization and analytics component, especially well-suited for large and/or streaming datasets.
Elixir - Elixir is a dynamic, functional language for building scalable and maintainable applications
superset - Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform
axon - Nx-powered Neural Networks
plotly - The interactive graphing library for Python :sparkles: This project now includes Plotly Express!