lisperanto
awesome-structure-editors
Our great sponsors
lisperanto | awesome-structure-editors | |
---|---|---|
7 | 10 | |
39 | 302 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 4.8 | |
over 1 year ago | about 1 month ago | |
JavaScript | Python | |
MIT License | Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lisperanto
-
Interesting examples of visual programming?
Lisperanto - in-browser AST editor with instant evaluation and code on canvas https://uprun.github.io/lisperanto/
- Ask HN: More “experimental“ UIs for editing/writing code?
-
Records are not objects in Lisperanto – in-browser IDE
hi, I am developing this project https://uprun.github.io/lisperanto/ and I hope that it will become how programms are written in the future, or at least some programms
- added Records feature to Lisperanto
-
Lisperanto - in-browser IDE
hello, I am working on an in-browser programming environment, try to re-discover computing principles, you can check the live version here: https://uprun.github.io/lisperanto/
-
Lisperanto - in browser IDE, which I will develop into serverless product
hi, my project is still in the development phase, but you can already try it online https://uprun.github.io/lisperanto/ my initial idea was to create just an in-browser IDE, but for sure I want to create a product out of it and serverless is a great opportunity for me.
-
Lisperanto – in browser IDE for Lisp-like language
by the way this is an open-source project you can follow updated here: https://github.com/uprun/lisperanto
awesome-structure-editors
-
Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control?
Yes, I think that we can do better than plain text as the source of truth, and thus git would probably need to change.
There's work around a bunch of languages that are not based on text, some have their own editor or a tool to manage a canonical representation in text for you that would make them friendlier to git.
- https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors/blob/main/README.md
- Structure Editors: A list of projectional code editor projects
-
Pijul: Version-Control Post-Git • Goto 2023
There's many more akin projects listed in https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors/blob/ma...
I can't wait fast enough for these ideas to reshape how we deal with programs and build stuff.
-
Is Haskell gaining or losing popularity?
Haskell seems to be pretty big. For example in this list of projects it appears to be the second most popular language (after TypeScript) :)
-
Ask HN: Any IDEs or text editor plugins with AST-driven navigation?
See https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors
-
A Block-Based Functional Programming Language
You could submit a pull request to get it added to awesome-structure-editors by /u/yairchu
-
Emacs Is Not Enough
It would be interesting to have such a general project go somewhere.
While in principle structural editing sounds like an incredible advance, there are 'good enough' advantages to plain-text tools that make it a much more practical solution. The other issue is of course integration with existing tooling, which you either skip entirely or compromise on the design.
What I feel is missing, between the description of "old, bad state of things" and "utopian vision" is a review of some of the projects that already tried to achieve this ideal state. It turns out there are a number of them, and most of them failed to achieve any traction or impact [0].
The rants are very long, so I skimmed quickly the one about git; I understand the complaints, although git is only bringing me joy and no pain --interactive rebase, absorb and a few aliases made it a breeze. But in a similar fashion there are projects trying to solve its fundamental issues, like pijul(.org); what are they missing?
[0] https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors/blob/ma...
- Ask HN: Is Vim still worth learning?
- Structure Editors
-
Ask HN: More “experimental“ UIs for editing/writing code?
Some good ones pops up in Projectional Programming [1] once in a while. The pinned thread links to the structure-editors github list [2] too.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/nosyntax/
[2] https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors
What are some alternatives?
gtoolkit - Glamorous Toolkit is the Moldable Development environment. It empowers you to make systems explainable through experiences tailored for each problem.
unit - Next Generation Visual Programming System
om-sharp - OM#: Visual Programming | Computer-assisted Music Compositon
metadesk
git-stack - Stacked branch management for Git
mps-code-reviewer - Code Review for JetBrains MPS providing integration with Bitbucket
impulse - Impossible Dev Tools for React and Tailwind
git-machete - Probably the sharpest git repository organizer & rebase/merge workflow automation tool you've ever seen
gumtree - An awesome code differencing tool