conduit
Kyverno
conduit | Kyverno | |
---|---|---|
33 | 35 | |
10,358 | 5,143 | |
0.7% | 1.6% | |
9.9 | 9.9 | |
7 days ago | 2 days ago | |
Go | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
conduit
-
Optimal JMX Exposure Strategy for Kubernetes Multi-Node Architecture
Leverage a service mesh like Istio or Linkerd to manage communication between microservices within the Kubernetes cluster. These service meshes can be configured to intercept JMX traffic and enforce access control policies. Benefits:
-
Linkerd no longer shipping open source, stable releases
Looks like CNCF waved them through Graduation anyway, let's look at policies from July 28, 2021 when they were deemed "Graduated"
All maintainers of the LinkerD project had @boyant.io email addresses. [0] They do list 4 other members of a "Steering Committee", but LinkerD's GOVERNANCE.md gives all of the power to maintainers: [1]
> Ideally, all project decisions are resolved by maintainer consensus. If this is not possible, maintainers may call a vote. The voting process is a simple majority in which each maintainer receives one vote.
And CNCF Graduation policy says a project must "Have committers from at least two organizations" [2]. So it appears that the CNCF accepted the "Steering Committee" as an acceptable 2nd committer, even though the Governance policy still gave the maintainers all of the power.
I would like to know if the Steering Committee voted to remove stable releases from an un-biased position acting in the best interest of the project, or if they were simply ignored or not even advised on the decision.
I'm all for Boyant doing what they need to do to make money and survive as a Company. But at that point my opinion is that they should withdraw the project from the CNCF and stop pretending like the foundation has any influence on the project's governance.
[0] https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd2/blob/489ca1e3189b6a5289d...
-
Ultimate EKS Baseline Cluster: Part 1 - Provision EKS
From here, we can explore other developments and tutorials on Kubernetes, such as o11y or observability (PLG, ELK, ELF, TICK, Jaeger, Pyroscope), service mesh (Linkerd, Istio, NSM, Consul Connect, Cillium), and progressive delivery (ArgoCD, FluxCD, Spinnaker).
-
Istio moved to CNCF Graduation stage
https://linkerd.io/ is a much lighter-weight alternative but you do still get some of the fancy things like mtls without needing any manual configuration. Install it, label your namespaces, and let it do it's thing!
-
Custom Authorization
Would it be possible to create a custom extension with the code that authorize traffic based on my custom access token?
-
API release strategies with API Gateway
Open source API Gateway (Apache APISIX and Traefik), Service Mesh (Istio and Linkerd) solutions are capable of doing traffic splitting and implementing functionalities like Canary Release and Blue-Green deployment. With canary testing, you can make a critical examination of a new release of an API by selecting only a small portion of your user base. We will cover the canary release next section.
-
GKE with Consul Service Mesh
I have experimented with other service meshes and I was able to get up to speed quickly: Linkerd = 1 day, Istio = 3 days, NGINX Service Mesh = 5 days, but Consul Connect service mesh took at least 11 days to get off the ground. This is by far the most complex solution available.
-
How is a service mesh implemented on low level?
https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd2 (random example)
- Kubernetes operator written in rust
-
What is a service mesh?
Out of the number of service mesh solutions that exist, the most popular open source ones are: Linkerd, Istio, and Consul. Here at Koyeb, we are using Kuma.
Kyverno
-
Stop 'k rollout restart deploy' from restarting everything?
Anyway, I haven’t checked for sure as I’m away from laptop but it should be possible to use something like Kyverno to block that operation. We had to do similar in the past to hotfix a bug in our CLI tool. I wrote a blog post about it that might give you an idea: https://www.giantswarm.io/blog/restricting-cluster-admin-permissions
-
An Overview of Kubernetes Security Projects at KubeCon Europe 2023
Cosign is used for signing containers through a variety of different methods. It has strong integration with other open source tools, such as Kyverno.
- Kyverno
-
container signing and verification using cosign and kyverno
cosign: https://docs.sigstore.dev/cosign/overview/ kyverno: https://kyverno.io/
-
Introduction to Day 2 Kubernetes
Kyverno - Kubernetes Native Policy Management
-
Admission controller to mutate cpu requests?
You could use a policy tool like kyverno or OPA.
-
Multi-tenancy with ProjectSveltos
Kyverno is present in the management cluster;
-
Did I miss something here, regarding network policies and helm templates? (Slightly ranty)
You do still have to create a policy for every namespace, but don't have to worry about labeling individual pods. We're starting to move to Helm/kustomize for our namespaces to deploy default things like network policies to each one, and we're also starting to use kyverno more, which I think is a little more purpose built for this type of thing than metacontroller is.
-
kubernetes provider resources v1 vs non-v1 is it just me or is this dumb?
I knew it was unsupported so about 6 months ago I had started an effort to switch to Kyverno, which is far better and actually supported. The version of Kyverno I was using had a v1beta1 AdmissionController. Fortunately that was in a helm chart so easily caught by pluto before my upgrade.
-
Kyverno Policy As Code Using CDK8S
Kyverno Kyverno is a policy engine designed for Kubernetes, Kyverno policies can validate, mutate, and generate Kubernetes resources plus ensure OCI image supply chain security.
What are some alternatives?
Zone of Control - ⬡ Zone of Control is a hexagonal turn-based strategy game written in Rust. [DISCONTINUED]
falco - Cloud Native Runtime Security
Parallel
gatekeeper - 🐊 Gatekeeper - Policy Controller for Kubernetes
Fractalide - Reusable Reproducible Composable Software
Kubewarden - Kubewarden is a policy engine for Kubernetes. It helps with keeping your Kubernetes clusters secure and compliant. Kubewarden policies can be written using regular programming languages or Domain Specific Languages (DSL) sugh as Rego. Policies are compiled into WebAssembly modules that are then distributed using traditional container registries.
keda - KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. It provides event driven scale for any container running in Kubernetes
OPA (Open Policy Agent) - Open Policy Agent (OPA) is an open source, general-purpose policy engine.
istio - Connect, secure, control, and observe services.
k-rail - Kubernetes security tool for policy enforcement
traefik - The Cloud Native Application Proxy
checkov - Prevent cloud misconfigurations and find vulnerabilities during build-time in infrastructure as code, container images and open source packages with Checkov by Bridgecrew.