lighthouse-ci VS nightwatch

- referred to https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/issues/6512 but didnt see network.disable error - added staticdistdir as per https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse-ci/blob/main/docs/configuration.md,

This approach would suit most of the cases however to achieve more accurate performance audits you should be conducting Lighthouse tests on a dedicated server to avoid results being affected by the machine capabilities. In other words, if you are running Lighthouse audits on a repository where there are several pull requests/workflows/pushes going on, the result of this audit may not be accurate and this is what we want to avoid. For that you would need a separate machine with Lighthouse Server installed on it. So on a pull request you would trigger this machine to conduct a performance audit and return response to your repository.

And finally, Lighthouse has a CI version you can run in your continuous integration. We’ll use this method to schedule periodical benchmarks.

TLDR; I use the Google Chrome Lighthouse CI with a .lighthouserc json configuration to test next start. The Lighthouse CI GitHub app is used to return a pass or fail status check in a PR.

You should also incorporate performance checks into your CI/CD pipeline. Use Lighthouse CI to run a synthetic Lighthouse test on each PR (PS: Learn why you shouldn't believe the Lighthouse score alone) and bundlesize package to raise alerts if your bundle size exceeds a certain threshold. For more nuanced data you should use WebPageTest.

You can also run Google’s Lighthouse CI tool against multiple URLs, and then hook that up to their self-hosted dashboard service: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse-ci

You can also set up lighthouse-ci as a github action to evaluate the web vitals on push or in pull requests.

You can have more consistent results if you set up Lighthouse CI in an external environment to test your page or use tools like SpeedCurve, but if you need to quickly inspect a website, I suggest taking a look at Page Speed Insights.

This name is already self-explanatory, and developers just need to run Lighthouse or its CI.

They also have a powerful CI tool (https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse-ci) with custom timelines, may look to implement it at some point

Nightwatch which will prompt to create a boilerplate framework specifically for Mobile / TV apps.

6.NightwatchJS: NightwatchJS is a Node.js-based end-to-end testing framework. Key Features: Simplifies writing test scripts using a simple syntax. Supports parallel test execution. Integrates with Selenium WebDriver for cross-browser testing

NightWatchJS

I have shown you the examples of using selectors in the Google Chrome dev tools, but the idea is similar when you write your automation scripts. I will use the Nightwatch testing framework to write the following snippets which will navigate to some webpage, wait to ensure that an interactive element has appeared in the DOM, and finally click on it. If you want to learn using Javascript with Nightwatch framework for your automated tests, you can start with our guide to this.

The reason for this behavior is thoroughly explained in Understanding the Command Queue Nightwatch.js GitHub wiki (it is a long read but it’s worth it). In this section, we will not look in such detail, this is going to be a summary of sorts. By the way, this command queue example can be found in Loadero’s public GitHub examples repository here.

Nightwatch.js is a popular open-source, Selenium JavaScript-based test automation framework for automating browser-based web applications and websites. It is written in Node.js runtime and uses the W3C WebDriver API (formerly Selenium WebDriver) for interacting with various browsers to perform commands and assertions on DOM elements.

For Firefox-specific options (like command-line args and browser about:config prefs), the property to use is moz:firefoxOptions. That is shipping in the latest default nightwatch.conf.js file, as is the parallel goog:chromeOptions for chromedriver. But if you've got a legacy configuration file—like I did—you'll want to update the old chromeOptions property, too.

Github Discussions