lawnicons VS OkHttp

Launcher: Lawnchair Icons:Lawnicons

Weather Widget We recently gave you a sneak peek of our new Weather Widget, and we're happy to share that it has expanded in functionality since then. We've meticulously fine-tuned its performance to ensure it remains lightweight while delivering accurate and up-to-date weather information right at your fingertips. Search in shortcuts (and probably files too!) You may have already noticed that some Smart Launcher settings now appear as search results. In Smart Launcher 6.3, we're supercharging our search capabilities to make it even more powerful and lightning-fast. Soon it will be possible to search in apps shortcuts (and files, but probably not at launch). Themed icons We included support for Themed icons in Smart Launcher, and unlike on Pixel, we will skin all your icons, even those that do not provide a Themed icon. The support for Themed icons is already present in Smart Launcher and it can be enabled by applying icon packs like Lawnicons. In SL6.3 you will be able to enable Themed icons without downloading an external icon pack.

🔹Nova launcher 🔹KWGT basic Widget 🔹Koda for kustom 🔹Lawnicons 🔹Pwalli wallpaper

Lawnicons (version 4): Icon pack for Lawnchair themed icons

I'm using Lawnicons and Pix Material You Light/Dark for some icons since I paid for it a while ago. Has some good widgets too.

Lawnicons by the Lawnchair Launcher team expands on the Pixel Launcher's hardcoded icon set and adds themed icons to many many apps that don't support it yet. If you use Lawnchair, it's useful to have even if you're on Android 13, because many third-party apps haven't adopted Themed Icon support yet.

Lawnicons

We will use Square’s Mock Webserver to spin up a mock server which we can use to simulate real api's request to the get coffee endpoint.

OkHttp Documentation

mockwebserver -> https://github.com/square/okhttp/tree/master/mockwebserver

I searched in the OkHttp GitHub project for an advice on which values may be suitable for Android apps nowadays but found no answers (only this old issue which does not help). Since we share a single OkHttp client Singleton for all our retrofit APIs and even Coil, I wonder if the default 5 maxRequestsPerHost is really enough.

You can technically add a Content-Length header for each part. It's not forbidden by the RFC, but nor is it common. It caused [problems](https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/2138) for OkHttp, and they eventually removed it. Might be fine for internal-only use, though.

Boundaries are a lot like UUIDs, and rely on the same logic. When generating random data, once you have enough bits, the odds are against that sequence of bits ever having been generated before in the universe.

Lets be specific. This is the gradle build file for Squares okhttp client library. How exactly would your bld tool "predict" or "help" with all the parameters needed? There is no need to be defensive. Replace those large build files with your own, show where your approach is better and then understanding will lead to better solutions.

And adding to that: The asynchttpclient library is just a thin wrapper around OkHttp3, so it might be easier to just go with that instead: https://square.github.io/okhttp/

Retrofit in combination with OkHttp for fetching data from server (which hopefully already exists)

OkHttp