lama VS SFTPGo

You could try to use ControlNet inpaint+lama locally, but results aren't as good in my experience. Or you could try local install of lama directly, but the setup process isn't very smooth.

You may be able to remove the actor with lama. https://github.com/advimman/lama

LaMa: Resolution-robust Large Mask Inpainting with Fourier Convolutions (Apache-2.0 license) Roman Suvorov, Elizaveta Logacheva, Anton Mashikhin, Anastasia Remizova, Arsenii Ashukha, Aleksei Silvestrov, Naejin Kong, Harshith Goka, Kiwoong Park, Victor Lempitsky (Samsung Research and EPFL)

You could try using LaMA: https://github.com/saic-mdal/lama .

Task 1: 30$ Write a script to prepare data for https://github.com/saic-mdal/lama. You should be able to prove on video that your script works properly after i give you some data and you train and there's some acceptable output (not perfect, since i know how ml works).

I have some interest in image inpainting, but the recent paper introduced by Samsung - https://github.com/saic-mdal/lama seems like it reached a stage where there isn't much room that we can add for novelty. I am quite interested but not confident if I can come up with a novel idea that can do better than the proposed model, especially if they trained the model on multiple GPUs for days, which is something that I don't have.

Code: https://github.com/saic-mdal/lama

EDIT: Thanks for the recommendations from all of you!! I've chose to use the below: - Files: sftpgo - Calendar: baikal - Notes: memos (But beware, it sends opt-out telemetry) - Network folder: webdav on sftpgo

Give a try to SFTPGo

> Even these projects have gotten to a level of sophistication that it would implode without big tech support.

The worst thing is that all this FAANG or VC backed companies make a lot of people believe that they are the only viable way.

> Why do you think you don't see any interesting oss tech from hobbyists is these days?

Actually not true, just an example, https://github.com/drakkan/sftpgo. But there are plenty of them.

This is possible using SFTPGo. The default Windows installer register SFTPGo as a Windows service. You can download the portable version and run it manually or install SFTPGo from the Scoop packages. You can use the built-in SFTPGo virtual permissions to only allow uploads. SFTPGo uses virtual users, no system users are required.

I suggest contacting your SFTP server vendor. I guess they have an auto blocking policy like this

Basically it's a file storage managed over HTTPS. Nextcloud is pretty heavy, that's the reason why I using just a single statically compiled cross-platform binary SFTPgo

Using SFTPGo you can easily configure read-only accounts. SFTPGo uses virtual users and virtual permissions. So you don't need to create system users for your SFTPGo users and you don't need to use chmod to make folders read-only (but the system user that SFTPGo runs as needs file system level permission to access the files/folders you want to share)

SFTPGo provides SFTP, FTP/S and HTTP/S so you can share the same files using different protocols and thus meet the different needs of your business partners. Allowed protocols can be enabled/disabled per-user

You could check out SFTPGo, it may meet your needs.