kyma VS Chocolatey

Although I had the project on my radar, I never took a closer look at it. However, now it was the time to give it a spin ... or try. All I needed was a Kubernetes environment. As I am working in the SAP space the choice of Kubernetes is kind of predefined, namely Kyma in its managed version on the SAP Business Technology Platform.

News from the SAP side: the clear focus is here SAP Business Technology Platform especially Kyma

I could only find https://github.com/kyma-project/kyma as something close to being real-world. But my google fu is failing here. Any help would be appreciated :)

I am using Kyma as opinionated stack on top of Kubernetes (to be precise on a Gardener cluster) for this exercise. The setup should be similar for vanilla stacks, but the API gateway must be adjusted accordingly depending on what you use.

So you can install Kyma 1.x without own domain, but you have no access to the Kyma console UI. An issue is open for this (https://github.com/kyma-project/kyma/issues/11924) and according to the Kyma slack channel the situation will improve with the upcoming release of Kyma 2.x, but until then you must provide an own domain to get access to the Kyma console UI. From my point of view this lifts the entry barrier of trying out open-source Kyma, but currently this is the way.

Chocolatey Windows software management solution, we use this for installing Python and Deno

Authenticating with Kyma is a (in my opinion) unnecessary challenge as it leverages the OIDC-login plugin for kubectl. You find a description of the setup here. This works fine when on a Mac but can give you some headaches on a Windows and on Linux machine especially when combined with restrictive setups in corporate environments. For Windows I can only recommend installing krew via chocolatey and then install the OIDC plugin via kubectl krew install oidc-login. At least for me that was the only way to get this working on Windows.

On a Windows machine, you can use Chocolatey by running the command.

I've used WSL2 and GHC/Nix--worked without any issues. However, there is Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org/

For OSX there is homebrew or pyenv (pyenv is another solution on Linux). As pyenv compiles from source it will require setting up XCode (the Apple IDE) tools to support this which can be pretty bulky. Windows users have chocolatey but the issue there is it works off the binaries. That means it won't have the latest security release available since those are source only. Conda is also another solution which can be picked up by Visual Studio Code as available versions of Python making development easier. In the end it might be best to consider using WSL on Windows for installing a Linux version and using that instead.

Type the following commands on the Windows terminal to install helm. You can use either Scoop a command-line installer for Windows or Chocolatey which is a Package Manager for Windows to install helm.

Für Software ninite.com und chocolatey.org

While you can install it in many ways, the easiest is using a package manager like Homebrew for macOS or chocolatey for Windows.