core VS freenetorg-website

Reasonable people can disagree on licensing issues, and obviously they can give out grants under whatever conditions they like, but telling developers that JetBrains knows what license is best for your project's users seems intrusive to me. My project has almost 900 github stars, it's under the LGPL and in almost 7 years no user has ever asked for a less restrictive license.

Anyone interested could create a plugin for tailwind similar to this one for another CSS framework.

Kweb - A Kotlin web framework built on SSR (server side rendering)

User Manual: https://docs.kweb.io/book

Kweb is a novel web framework that acts as a remote interface to the web browser's DOM (Document Object Model). With Kweb, you can create and manipulate DOM elements and listen for and handle events, all using an intuitive Kotlin DSL that mirrors the structure of the HTML being created.

Kweb manages state through observable mutable values called kvars:

    import kweb.*

Github | User Manual | Release Notes

Shouldn't be anything preventing you from using it with tailwind right now, see here for an example of adding a CSS include to a page, then just modify element's class attributes as tailwind requires.

Yes, with Kweb the server drives most aspects of the browser, so a persistent connection is needed, but this is easy enough to set up. Our demo website runs on GCP behind a load-balancer with autoscaling, and it works nicely.

Yes provided the load balancer supports sticky sessions. Here is an example Kwebsite that runs on Google Cloud Platform with autoscaling (using FireStore as a DB).

The live website is https://freenet.org/, you can see the code which renders it here.

Pull requests welcome, find the source code here, and provide feedback here.