kubernetes-webhook-haskell VS octopod

Compare kubernetes-webhook-haskell vs octopod and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
kubernetes-webhook-haskell octopod
- 2
4 136
- 0.0%
0.0 0.0
4 months ago 2 months ago
Haskell Haskell
MIT License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

kubernetes-webhook-haskell

Posts with mentions or reviews of kubernetes-webhook-haskell. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning kubernetes-webhook-haskell yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

octopod

Posts with mentions or reviews of octopod. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Alternative Approach to Dynamic Environments: Using Octopod
    1 project | dev.to | 1 Nov 2021
    In this post, I’d like to tell you how we use dynamic environments (review or preview environments) in our work here at Typeable, what issues we’ve managed to solve, and how and why we use our Octopod solution for these purposes instead of GitLab Dynamic Environments. In case you don’t know what the dynamic environment is, I recommend reading the post by Flant where the author gives a detailed account of the types of dynamic environments, their purpose and applications. The author also looks into this topic using GitLab as an example and provides detailed cases and descriptions. As for us, we use an alternative approach, somewhat different in terms of ideology, and work with review environments in Octopod. Previously we related the history of Octopod creation and the causes that motivated us to create it. We won’t repeat ourselves but will focus on the differences of our approach and the issues we’ve fixed.
  • Alloy and an adventure with database concurrency
    1 project | dev.to | 5 Mar 2021
    Testing in staging environment by dedicated QA engineers (check out Octopod, our open-source solution for managing multiple deployments)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing kubernetes-webhook-haskell and octopod you can also consider the following projects:

postgrest - REST API for any Postgres database

hercules-ci-agent - https://hercules-ci.com build and deployment agent

kubernetes-client-core - Haskell client for the kubernetes API. A work in progress.

hpack-dhall - Use hpack's phrasing in dhall to write cabal files

Openshift Origin - Conformance test suite for OpenShift

werf - A solution for implementing efficient and consistent software delivery to Kubernetes facilitating best practices.

stan - 🕵️ Haskell STatic ANalyser

argo-cd - Declarative Continuous Deployment for Kubernetes