caster VS optparse-applicative

Compare caster vs optparse-applicative and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
caster optparse-applicative
- 1
6 898
- -
0.0 5.9
almost 5 years ago 3 months ago
Haskell Haskell
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

caster

Posts with mentions or reviews of caster. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning caster yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

optparse-applicative

Posts with mentions or reviews of optparse-applicative. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing caster and optparse-applicative you can also consider the following projects:

optparse-generic - Auto-generate a command-line parser for your datatype

optparse-declarative - Declarative command-line option parser

blucontrol - Configurable blue light filter

bench - Command-line benchmark tool

farmhash

CMQ - Cwmwl Message Queue

filepath - Haskell FilePath core library

async-pool

envy - :angry: Environmentally friendly environment variables

prefork

repl-toolkit - Toolkit for quickly whipping up command-line interfaces.

hsyslog-udp