Key Transparency
SFTPGo
Our great sponsors
Key Transparency | SFTPGo | |
---|---|---|
4 | 236 | |
1,557 | 8,117 | |
- | - | |
1.0 | 9.5 | |
almost 3 years ago | 8 days ago | |
Go | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Key Transparency
-
DTLS-SRTP spoofing
However, a MITM controlling the signaling server could manipulate any attempt to communicate the fingerprint between the endpoints. Hence why certificate verification should be out-of-band (with regards to the signaling server). The most common solution I've seen is that the call participants can just read the fingerprints to each other and ensure they match. But there are other solutions including using a trusted third party, or even key transparency... because blockchain.
-
Key transparency: A transparent and secure way to look up public keys
Archived. Not sure when. :( I'm not sure what if anything is a decent replacement/substitute.
In the README examples I see text about what I think is Certificate Transparency. That was definitely the first thing this made me think of. There's also a lot of talk in the project about CONIKS[1], & associate research papers are about 'bringing key transparency to end users'.
The scenarios[2] are interesting, but I'm not sure fully how this project helps. They explicitly call out Upspin for encrypted storage, which was linked recently[3].
It appears to make heavy use of the Trillian cryptographically verifiable data store[4].
[1] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/04/coniks.html
[2] https://github.com/google/keytransparency/blob/master/docs/s...
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31520559
[4] https://github.com/google/trillian
-
Why Doesn't Email Use Certificates?
Key Transparency is an example of such a system, built on a highly scalable backend system (Trillian, which powers Certificate Transparency), but it's been under development for several years without a production deployment.
SFTPGo
-
What you guys are hosting instead of Nextcloud? I'm sick of it.
EDIT: Thanks for the recommendations from all of you!! I've chose to use the below: - Files: sftpgo - Calendar: baikal - Notes: memos (But beware, it sends opt-out telemetry) - Network folder: webdav on sftpgo
-
FTP Server on Linux
Give a try to SFTPGo
-
HashiCorp Did It Backwards
> Even these projects have gotten to a level of sophistication that it would implode without big tech support.
The worst thing is that all this FAANG or VC backed companies make a lot of people believe that they are the only viable way.
> Why do you think you don't see any interesting oss tech from hobbyists is these days?
Actually not true, just an example, https://github.com/drakkan/sftpgo. But there are plenty of them.
-
Running an FTP server WITHOUT admin priveleges
This is possible using SFTPGo. The default Windows installer register SFTPGo as a Windows service. You can download the portable version and run it manually or install SFTPGo from the Scoop packages. You can use the built-in SFTPGo virtual permissions to only allow uploads. SFTPGo uses virtual users, no system users are required.
-
Do you have individuals that access a Public-Facing SFTP Server - how can you lock down the SFTP Server?
I suggest contacting your SFTP server vendor. I guess they have an auto blocking policy like this
-
Was the move to AES 256 really necessary?
Basically it's a file storage managed over HTTPS. Nextcloud is pretty heavy, that's the reason why I using just a single statically compiled cross-platform binary SFTPgo
- A lightweight nextcloud alternative
-
Simple read only ftp server
Using SFTPGo you can easily configure read-only accounts. SFTPGo uses virtual users and virtual permissions. So you don't need to create system users for your SFTPGo users and you don't need to use chmod to make folders read-only (but the system user that SFTPGo runs as needs file system level permission to access the files/folders you want to share)
-
Sftp or Sharepoint links- security
SFTPGo provides SFTP, FTP/S and HTTP/S so you can share the same files using different protocols and thus meet the different needs of your business partners. Allowed protocols can be enabled/disabled per-user
-
Pre-made solution for allowing a client to upload a file to my web hosting (via browser, not FTP client)?
You could check out SFTPGo, it may meet your needs.
What are some alternatives?
Vault - A tool for secrets management, encryption as a service, and privileged access management
minio - The Object Store for AI Data Infrastructure
Caddy - Fast and extensible multi-platform HTTP/1-2-3 web server with automatic HTTPS
OpenMediaVault - openmediavault is the next generation network attached storage (NAS) solution based on Debian Linux. Thanks to the modular design of the framework it can be enhanced via plugins. openmediavault is primarily designed to be used in home environments or small home offices.
traefik - The Cloud Native Application Proxy
Filestash - 🦄 A modern web client for SFTP, S3, FTP, WebDAV, Git, Minio, LDAP, CalDAV, CardDAV, Mysql, Backblaze, ...
etcd - Distributed reliable key-value store for the most critical data of a distributed system
nginx-prometheus - Turn Nginx logs into Prometheus metrics
Ponzu - Headless CMS with automatic JSON API. Featuring auto-HTTPS from Let's Encrypt, HTTP/2 Server Push, and flexible server framework written in Go.
nextcloud-in-docker-recipe - My cnfiguration files to run NextCloud in Docker behind Traefik