k0s VS filemanager

I am myself studying it and going through the official documentation and toying with k8s flavors like kind, k3s and k0s.

There's a whole community of hobbyists building Raspberry Pi clusters, porting things to work on various Arm processors, exploring and contributing to minimalist distros like k0s and microk8s, etc.

root@localhost:~# curl -sSLf https://get.k0s.sh | sudo sh Downloading k0s from URL: https://github.com/k0sproject/k0s/releases/download/v1.25.4+k0s.0/k0s-v1.25.4+k0s.0-amd64 k0s is now executable in /usr/local/bin root@localhost:~# k0s install controller --single root@localhost:~# k0s start root@localhost:~# k0s status Version: v1.25.4+k0s.0 Process ID: 1064 Role: controller Workloads: true SingleNode: true Kube-api probing successful: true Kube-api probing last error: root@localhost:~# k0s kubectl cluster-info Kubernetes control plane is running at https://localhost:6443 CoreDNS is running at https://localhost:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system/services/kube-dns:dns/proxy To further debug and diagnose cluster problems, use 'kubectl cluster-info dump'. 443/TCP 97s root@localhost:~# k0s kubectl get nodes -o wide NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION INTERNAL-IP EXTERNAL-IP OS-IMAGE KERNEL-VERSION CONTAINER-RUNTIME localhost Ready control-plane 100s v1.25.4+k0s 172.105.131.23 Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS 5.15.0-47-generic containerd://1.6.9 root@localhost:~# curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-release/release/v1.25.4/bin/linux/amd64/kubectl && chmod +x kubectl && mv kubectl /usr/bin/ % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 42.9M 100 42.9M 0 0 75.2M 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 75.3M root@localhost:~# k0s kubeconfig admin > ~/.kube/config root@localhost:~# type kubectl kubectl is hashed (/usr/bin/kubectl) root@localhost:~# kubectl get po,svc -A NAMESPACE NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE kube-system pod/kube-proxy-clxh7 1/1 Running 0 3m56s kube-system pod/kube-router-88x25 1/1 Running 0 3m56s kube-system pod/coredns-5d5b5b96f9-4xzsl 1/1 Running 0 4m3s kube-system pod/metrics-server-69d9d66ff8-fxrt7 1/1 Running 0 4m2s NAMESPACE NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE default service/kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 443/TCP 4m20s kube-system service/kube-dns ClusterIP 10.96.0.10 53/UDP,53/TCP,9153/TCP 4m8s kube-system service/metrics-server ClusterIP 10.98.18.100 443/TCP 4m2s

I use k0s btw ,and it is fantastic.

Here is link number 1 - Previous text "k0s"

So for example, in my own personal infra repos and for projects I do, Make orchestrates Pulumi, dnscontrol (Holy shit is that tool underrated), ansible, k0s/k0sctl (I run that distro), and all the kubernetes stuff.

I wasn’t able to run Kubernetes in NAS last time I tried it. https://github.com/k0sproject/k0s/issues/1184. As for public access you don’t want to do it for security reasons and instead rely on vpn. Tailscale and ZeroTier are easy to setup.

I prefer k0s, https://k0sproject.io/ .

actually that is not really true - i strongly urge you to try out http://k3s.io/ or https://k0sproject.io/

these are full-fledged, certified k8s distributions that run on raspberry pi as well as all the way in production.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=raspberry+pi+k3...

File Browser

Thanks for sharing. I wasn't aware of dufs and it looks very solid. Fileserver[0] is another popular choice, though it's more GUI-oriented for file operations.

[0]: https://filebrowser.org/

The OnlyOfffice desktop app is a pretty good and free alternative to Microsoft Office Suite. You can simply install it on your local machine for offline access.

OnlyOfffice is also self-hostable as a web app for a cloud alternative to Google Sheets.

Filebrowser is a self-hostable alternative to Google Drive.

There's a pull request open to integrate OnlyOffice with Filebrowser for self-hosted google-drive + google docs.

https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/pull/1420

For strictly local use, Google's Nearby share is technically FOSS but the documentation is basically non-existent and a proper Linux implementation is not here yet. Alternatives aren't hard to find though, with Mint's Warpinator or KDE Connect having worked well for me.

For non-local use (everything out of Bluetooth range), you almost have to trust a third party and it really depends on your use case. Want to send your friend a file or host pictures of your birthday for multiple people to download? For the former magic wormhole works great, for the later you could almost spin up a nextcloud or similar (personally I like https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser ). Want to regularly send files from device 1 to device 2? Now classic sync solutions like syncthing become really viable.

If everything else fails, FTP always has your back

I have been looking for a file browser which can run in game mode and is reasonably user friendly for simple file operations (copy/delete/rename, etc). Most people recommend Dolphin. it does work but there are issues: the color scheme looks really weird in game mode. context menu does not like game mode, either. Got file browser working (https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser) in game mode, which essentially an Edge app accessing a web server on localhost (running as user service). It took some time to set up but the end result is exactly what I would like to have.

File Browser - For access to the files on my NAS

filebrowser has user management plus sharing capabilities

Filebrowser suppports multiple shares with different expiration dates. It also offers file previews and generates QR Codes for the shares.

NextCloud is great for this, but if we're talking sharing files from your sync'd project collection, I'd probably instead recommend Filebrowser. You can point it to the same data store that syncthing is using and it'll make it easy to share the projects. Note that in order to do this you'll need to open up and expose filebrowser publicly. The simplest way to do this would probably be a cloudflare tunnel and for sharing files like this ad-hoc I don't see any issues with their TOS. For things like SyncThing though you'll still wanna do conventional port forwarding. the DIY approach instead of CloudFlare tunnel would be to port forward, set up a dynamic dns record, and set up letsencrypt certs