juliamono VS Librefox

I use JuliaMono most of the time. I sometimes switch to Berkeley Mono if I want fewer flourishes. I built an on-the-fly font switcher into my terminal so it's super easy to flip back and forth as the mood suits me.

Julia has made symbol input manageable and lets you define infix operators for many of the Unicode symbols that make sense for that. [1] And JuliaMono was designed to support the symbols that Julia does. [2]

I generally do quite fine with my Compose Key configuration, though (even on Windows, where I use WinCompose). [3]

[1]: https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/unicode-input/

[2]: https://juliamono.netlify.app/

[3]: https://github.com/samhocevar/wincompose

Consider Julia Mono. It has massive Unicode support and looks nice.

In a less-condensed typeface, I happen to like JuliaMono.

You could try JuliaMono. It has the most extensive gallery of glyphs of all the fonts I know of.

JuliaMono: https://juliamono.netlify.app/.

JuliaMono typeface (Not an app, but much worth having.)

Change to a font that contains those Glyphs. JuliaMono is probably the best option in terms of the number of provided glyphs: https://juliamono.netlify.app/.

Firefox &/or LibreFox

Librefox[1] is a drop in replacement without the antifeatures.

[1] https://github.com/intika/Librefox

See https://github.com/intika/Librefox/issues/43.

Librefox hasn't been updated since 2018, you shouldn't use it.

Librefox has not received an update since December 2018, you are recommending an outdated browser.

A terrible recommendation, Librefox has not received any new updates since December 2018.

I fear this will suffer the same fate as many other privacy "forks". I'll still give it a try.

They clearly mention the reasons in a Gitlab issue.