juicefs VS s3fs-fuse

Support for Kerberos keytab files

JuiceFS under the Apache License 2.0, is a high-performance POSIX file system optimized for cloud-native environments. It stores data in Object Storage (e.g., Amazon S3) and metadata in databases like Redis, MySQL, or TiKV. JuiceFS integrates massive cloud storage with big data, machine learning, and AI applications efficiently, akin to local storage. It features full POSIX and Hadoop compatibility, S3 interface, Kubernetes support, and shared file storage for numerous clients. Some cool features are - strong consistency, scalable performance, data encryption, global file locks, and compression with LZ4 or Zstandard.

To improve the handling process of capacity overrun, the JuiceFS client supports deletion operations in the case of Ceph cluster fullness (see related code changes in JuiceFS Community Edition). Therefore, for newer client versions, there is no need to use set-full-ratio for temporary adjustments.

If you have any questions or would like to learn more, feel free to join discussions about JuiceFS on GitHub and the JuiceFS community on Slack.

The architecture image shows GCS and others, so I suspect it does.

https://github.com/juicedata/juicefs#architecture

See also: JuiceFS: https://juicefs.com/

Adds a DBMS or key-value store for metadata, making the filesystem much faster (POSIX, small overwrites don't have to replace a full object in the GCS/S3 backend).

Almost certainly a better solution if you want to turn your object storage into a mountable filesystem, with the (big) caveat that you can't access the files directly in the bucket (they are not stored transparently).

JuiceFS can do the same thing as s3fs-fuse, but better. Because it supports robust data consistency and caching policies to improve performance.

The author needs to ask themselves: in this cloud technology stack, is there POSIX involved somewhere lower down, where I can't access it? The answer is, of course, "yes". The sort of cloud storage systems described all run on top of POSIX APIs. They provide convenience (cost efficiency is more debatable) compared to the POSIX alternative, but that's because they exist at an entirely different conceptual layer (hence the presence of POSIX anyway, just buried).

Your point about surfacing a POSIX that's actually there but hidden and thus visible to low-level Amazon employees building the S3 service which makes it invisible to S3 end customers is true but isn't the the point of the article. The author is saying there are motivations for a POSIX-like api visible also the end user.

So your explanation of stack looks like 2 layers: POSIX api <-- AWS S3 built on top of that

Author's essay is actually talking about 3 layers: POSIX <-- AWS S3 <-- POSIX

That's why the blog post has the following links to POSIX-on-top-of-S3-objects :

https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse

https://github.com/kahing/goofys

https://www.cuno.io/

sudo apt install build-essential libfuse-dev fuse git clone https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.git cd s3fs-fuse sudo apt install libfuse2 sudo apt install libcurl4-openssl-dev sudo apt install libxml2-dev ./autogen.sh ./configure make

Don’t know actually. Here is project page.

s3fs-fuse

How is this different than these other solutions?

https://github.com/kahing/goofys

https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse

I don’t get it. Why not just improve https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse