Judge0 API VS Metasploit

There are services like Judge0 which you can use to execute the code in a sandbox. Just send a code as a string and get a result back. You can either use their cloud offering or deploy the container yourself (it is opensource). https://github.com/judge0/judge0

I'm trying to run a local version of the Judge0 compiler, but I can't seem to access it.

I have a front-end app which exposes a code editor where the user can provide some code and it will be compiled and executed using judge0 (so not on my server). I would like to be able to save the code created by a user, but I'm not sure of the best route to do this. My initial thought was to save the code as a string in a database, passing through my back-end which could potentially have some sanitizing methods to try and minimize any danger with this. However, I'm not sure how practical/feasible it is to try and sanitize code - has anyone attempted to do this previously or have experience in this domain?

You can deploy Judge0 Extra CE on your own servers for free. Here are the release notes that include the deployment procedure.

https://judge0.com/ to run the code, you can can host it on your server for free or use their api.

A signal gets called which gets sent over Django Channels (but you can probably use an mq or something for this) which notifies a microservice that is responsible for sending and receiving submissions to an instance of https://judge0.com/

wget https://github.com/judge0/judge0/releases/download/v1.12.0/judge0-v1.12.0.zip unzip judge0-v1.12.0.zip

Metasploit

Metasploit: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework

1-) Learn Hacking on a debian based distro like Kali Linux - I personally started with tools like nikto, camhacker... and then moved to more complex frameworks like metasploit.

I once had to give a presentation about Metasploit, and whether it was ethically correct for the creator to make it free and open-source, available to everyone. And in researching this I realized that there were a lot of parallels between the arguments for or against hacking tools being readily available and the arguments for or against gun control. I'll just list a few quickly:

Metasploit Framework (mentioned earlier)

This phase is where the pen testers practically prove that there exist potential vulnerabilities in the target system. The pen testers do the hacking using an array of technical approaches and social engineering methods to exploit the vulnerabilities. The ethical hackers commonly use Metasploit framework to automatically execute exploitation against the target systems. Moreover, they may install malwares such as rootkit to persistently maintain their foothold and further compromise the target system.