jsbundling-rails
vite
jsbundling-rails | vite | |
---|---|---|
38 | 791 | |
798 | 64,913 | |
1.6% | 1.1% | |
6.9 | 9.9 | |
about 1 month ago | 3 days ago | |
Ruby | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
jsbundling-rails
- Rails Merging Support for Bun.sh
- Rails Frontend Bundling - Which one should I choose?
-
Is the default importmap method unrealistic in the most popular real world use cases?
I think this is more like a demo - you will not get the same features as jsbundling-rails by only following instructions in the video. For that you will need to change some other files as well. You can find out what files to be added/changed from the install script. The important bits are mostly the same as in the video, but some supplement parts are not mentioned in the video. Some people actually reported in the comment that they can't deploy such app, but I think it depends.
-
at my wits' end.. please help me figure out why javascript won't work (Rails 7 with esbuild)
I'm sorry, I didn't see that in your title. Using esbuild is 100% supported by Rails through this gem https://github.com/rails/jsbundling-rails. Have a look at the docs there to make sure that you're setup correctly.
-
Configure Stimulus with esbuild and Babel — Rails & Javascript
Rails applications are bundler-agnostic. They do not care how you bundle your javascript code. It just expects whatever comes from the bundler to be placed under app/assets, so the asset pipeline processes it. We can see this in the official jsbundling-rails gem, which consists of scripts to install different bundlers and configure a default npm build command to generate our bundles—no interaction whatsoever with the Rails configuration. This black-box bundler logic allows us to change and update our bundler system without tuning any other aspect of our Rails application.
-
foreman: not found
Hello, this is my first time setting up a rails app that also uses react, I am using https://github.com/rails/jsbundling-rails I went with esbuild because I am following this tutorial on setting it up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoLJXjEV2nM, however when I run bin/dev in the terminal I get the error bin/dev: 8: exec: foreman: not found
- Ruby 3.2 + Rails 7 + Tailwind + Font Awesome - should be blazing fast, yet tests very slow. 20 requests are being made. How do I make fewer requests, create fewer objects and make this simple app super fast? Production : https pickaxe dot ca. Thank you! -Dan H
-
How to bundle assets in a Rails engine
You first install your asset handlers as you need them for your project. They can be anything from rails/jsbundling-rails and rails/tailwindcss-rails to webpacker or something custom.
-
Comparing Phoenix to Rails in December 2022
The functionality comes from https://github.com/rails/jsbundling-rails and https://github.com/rails/cssbundling-rails -- both come with Rails 7 and all you have to do is generate your app with the choices you want such as -j esbuild --css tailwind.
-
Vercel announces Turbopack, the successor to Webpack
The Rails https://github.com/rails/jsbundling-rails gem lets you pick between esbuild, rollup and Webpack. If Turbopack ends up being popular then jsbundling should be able to support it.
The nice thing about Rails now is there's no direct integration like Webpacker once was. Now we can basically use the JS tool straight up and Rails will just look at assets in a specific directory, it doesn't matter what tool generated it.
vite
-
FlowDiver: The Road to SSR - Part 1
Given our team's collective proficiency within the React ecosystem, we decided to leverage this expertise for our project. Initially, we contemplated utilizing Next.js; however, due to the limited practical experience with this technology among key engineers and the pressing timeline to develop the first prototype, we opted for a Single Page Application(SPA) approach. For bundling, we selected Vite, primarily due to its super fast build times, simplicity of configuration, and potential for a nearly seamless transition to server-side rendering.
-
Inflight Magazine no. 9
We are continuing to add new project templates for various types of projects, and we've recently created one for the infamous combination of React with Vite tooling.
-
Top 12+ Battle-Tested React Boilerplates for 2024
Vite focuses on providing an extremely fast development server and workflow speed in web development. It uses its own ES module imports during development, speeding up the startup time.
-
Vite vs Nextjs: Which one is right for you?
Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.
-
Setup React Typescript with Vite & ESLint
import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })
-
Approaches to Styling React Components, Best Use Cases
I am currently utilizing Vite:
-
Getting started with TiniJS framework
Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/
-
Use CSS Variables to style react components on demand
Without any adding any dependencies you can connect react props to raw css at runtime with nothing but css variables (aka "custom properties"). If you add CSS modules on top you don't have to worry about affecting the global scope so components created in this way can be truly modular and transferrable. I use this with vite.
-
RubyJS-Vite
Little confused as to why it has vite in it‘s name, it seems unrelated to https://vitejs.dev/
-
Ask HN: How do we include JavaScript scripts in a browser these days?
it says in their docs that they recommend Vite https://vitejs.dev/
it goes like this.
1. you create a repo folder, you cd into it.
2. you create a client template using vite which can be plain typescript, or uses frameworks such as react or vue, at https://vitejs.dev/guide/
3. you cd in that client directory, you npm install, then you npm run dev, it should show you that it works at localhost:5173
4. you follow the instructions on your url, you do npm install @web3modal/wagmi @wagmi/core @wagmi/connectors viem
5. you follow the further instructions.
> It seems like this is for npm or yarn to pull from a remote repository maintained by @wagmi for instance. But then what?
you install the wagmi modules, then you import them in your js code, those code can run upon being loaded or upon user actions such as button clicks
> Do I just symlink to the node_modules directory somehow? Use browserify? Or these days I'd use webpack or whatever the cool kids are using these days?
no need for those. browserify is old school way of transpiling commonjs modules into browser-compatible modules. webpack is similar. vite replaces both webpack and browserify. vite also uses esbuild and swc under the hood which replaces babel.
> I totally get how node package management works ... for NODE. But all these client-side JS projects these days have docs that are clearly for the client-side but the ES2015 module examples they show seem to leave out all instructions for how to actually get the files there, as if it's obvious.
pretty much similar actually. except on client-side, you have src and dist folders. when you run "npm run build" vite will compile the src dir into dist dir. the outputs are the static files that you can serve with any http server such as npx serve, or caddy, or anything really.
> What gives? And finally, what exactly does "browserify" do these days, since I think Node supports both ES modules and and CJS modules? I also see sometimes UMD universal modules
vite supports both ecmascript modules and commonjs modules. but these days you'll just want to stick with ecmascript which makes your code consistently use import and export syntax, and you get the extra benefit of it working well with your vscode intellisense.
> In short, I'm a bit confused how to use package management properly with browsers in 2024: https://modern-web.dev/guides/going-buildless/es-modules/
if people want plain js there is unpkg.com and esm.sh way, but the vite route is the best for you as it's recommended and tested by the providers of your modules.
> And finally, if you answer this, can you spare a word about typescript? Do we still need to use Babel and Webpack together to transpile it to JS, and minify and tree-shake, or what?
I recommend typescript, as it gives you better type-safety and better intellisense, but it really depends. If you're new to it, it can slow you down at first. But as your project grows you'll eventually see the value of it. In vite there are options to scaffold your project in pure js or ts.
What are some alternatives?
importmap-rails - Use ESM with importmap to manage modern JavaScript in Rails without transpiling or bundling.
Next.js - The React Framework
vite_ruby - ⚡️ Vite.js in Ruby, bringing joy to your JavaScript experience
parcel - The zero configuration build tool for the web. 📦🚀
hotwire-rails - Use Hotwire in your Ruby on Rails app
esbuild - An extremely fast bundler for the web
esbuild-live-reload
swc - Rust-based platform for the Web
Webpacker - Use Webpack to manage app-like JavaScript modules in Rails
astro - The web framework for content-driven websites. ⭐️ Star to support our work!
Rollup - Next-generation ES module bundler