js-xml-literal
Implements XML literals in Javascript via desugaring, as a sane alternative to E4X. Server-side and client-side environments are supported which gives you the power to quickly and safely generate markup. (by laverdet)
unocss
The instant on-demand atomic CSS engine. (by unocss)
Our great sponsors
| js-xml-literal | unocss | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56 | |
| 61 | 15,386 | |
| - | 2.6% | |
| 10.0 | 9.6 | |
| over 9 years ago | 4 days ago | |
| JavaScript | TypeScript | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
js-xml-literal
Posts with mentions or reviews of js-xml-literal.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-13.
-
State of the Web: React
In 2013, Facebook renamed FBolt, you guessed it, React. Additionally, they started working on JSX, an abstraction layer for defining UI in React. JSX made compiling HTML like statements to JavaScript function calls. Interestingly, according to a post by the React team, JSX was initially based on a system in PHP that allowed for embedding XML literals. JSX was initially just a fork of jsx-xml-literal.
unocss
Posts with mentions or reviews of unocss.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-06.
-
Tailwind CSS v4.0.0 Alpha
I wish tailwind would support attributify like https://github.com/unocss/unocss, which is much more readable for complex layouts:
link - UnoCSS — an Instant On-Demand Atomic CSS Engine
-
Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
I feel the same about people praising Tailwind.
Tailwind (and similar, I tend to use https://unocss.dev/) is not good for your frontend architecture BUT they allow you to be so fast, that it negates the benefits.
For a job well done, I'd follow the principles of https://maintainablecss.com/
-
What do you think we can do better to improve Vue position in the frontend space as a dominant UI framework?
I think UnoCss is may be better than Tailwind already and has a good Vue integration https://unocss.dev/
-
~~New~~ Old way to write CSS
The most popular tools that implement this approach are: Tailwind, WindiCSS, UnoCSS.
-
Which is best for DX and efficiency, TailwindCSS, UnoCSS, PandaCSS, or the new MasterCSS
- UnoCSS: https://unocss.dev/
-
A design system for the federal government
haha, fair point. Still, I'm on the fence about how utility components are namespaced in USWDS. Perhaps giving users the flexibility to define the namespace might work better? One thing that bugs me is the absence of class-sorting like we have in TailwindCSS. Plus, there are some gaps I've noticed in USWDS. The naming, especially when comparing "padding-x-2" and "p-x-2", can be really annoying when switching around, maybe that could also be an option for the developer or project. Similar to the ideas antfu has on uno.css https://unocss.dev/ ♥
-
Modern CSS Framework or Library for Static Websites?
UnoCSS is a popular option
-
Vrite Editor: Open-Source WYSIWYG Markdown Editor
UnoCSS — for styling with Tailwind-like atomic CSS;
-
Why I Switched From Neovim to VSCode
Some exceptional libraries and frameworks only support VSCode, which you could argue is a bad thing, but it makes sense, VSCode is the most popular code editor after all. For example UnoCSS only has a VSCode extension, and it's my favourite way to write CSS. Astro has a LSP but I've found that the experience in VSCode is much better than in Neovim.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing js-xml-literal and unocss you can also consider the following projects:
vanilla-extract - Zero-runtime Stylesheets-in-TypeScript
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.
astro - The web framework for content-driven websites. ⭐️ Star to support our work!
windicss - Next generation utility-first CSS framework.
FaxJs - Fax Javascript Ui Framework
tail-kit - Tail-kit is a free and open source components and templates kit fully coded with Tailwind css 3.0.
unplugin-vue-components - 📲 On-demand components auto importing for Vue
Quasar Framework - Quasar Framework - Build high-performance VueJS user interfaces in record time
pico - Minimal CSS Framework for semantic HTML
windicss-intellisense - Intelligent WindiCSS tooling for VS Code
js-xml-literal vs vanilla-extract
unocss vs Tailwind CSS
js-xml-literal vs astro
unocss vs windicss
js-xml-literal vs FaxJs
unocss vs tail-kit
js-xml-literal vs Tailwind CSS
unocss vs unplugin-vue-components
unocss vs Quasar Framework
unocss vs vanilla-extract
unocss vs pico
unocss vs windicss-intellisense