jnode VS snapbox

Compare jnode vs snapbox and see what are their differences.

jnode

Code for the JNode operating system (by jnode)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
jnode snapbox
2 6
317 110
-0.9% 1.8%
0.0 9.4
over 2 years ago 5 days ago
Java Rust
- Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

jnode

Posts with mentions or reviews of jnode. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-12.

snapbox

Posts with mentions or reviews of snapbox. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-07.
  • Announcing diff.rs!
    13 projects | /r/rust | 7 Mar 2023
    If needed, here is an example of per-word diffing and highlighting of trailing newline differences.
  • Trycmd just ignores my tests
    1 project | /r/rust | 4 Oct 2022
    I see. I would try writing the same name as in your Cargo.toml. For example, if yours was toml [package] name = "caesor_cipher" I would try bin.name = "caesor_cipher" It seems that trycmd might ignore a test if the bin.name field is incorrect: https://github.com/assert-rs/trycmd/issues/105
  • Rust: A Critical Retrospective
    19 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 19 May 2022
    I find rustdoc lacking for clap. rustdoc does a good job with API reference documentation and is improving in its handling of examples but derive reference and tutorial documentation are a weak point.

    For examples, its improving with the example scraping work (e.g. https://docs.rs/clap/latest/clap/struct.ArgMatches.html#meth...) but testing of example is still lacking. I've written trycmd to help (https://github.com/assert-rs/trycmd).

    For derive reference and tutorial documentation, your choices are

    - A very long, hard to navigate top-level documentation, see https://docs.rs/structopt/latest/structopt/

    - External documentation, see https://serde.rs/

    - Dummy modules to store your documentation (I've seen this used but can't remember one off the top of my head)

    For clap, my documentation examples are best served as programs and we've had a problem with these being broken. The Rust CLI book has a decent strategy for this by pulling in code from external files (https://rust-cli.github.io/book/index.html). I was tempted to do that for clap where example code and output (all verified via trycmd) are pulled into an mdbook site but I've stopped short and just have a README that links out to everything (https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/blob/master/examples/tutoria...). Its not great.

  • Great thanks to the rust community for having a book (sort of like the rust book) for some crates as well. Makes everything infinitely approachable
    4 projects | /r/rust | 30 Dec 2021
    Another problem we found in clap was it was easy for our examples to build but harder to make sure they worked. This is why I wrote trycmd (example "tests").
  • ANN: `trycmd` v0.7.0 released!
    3 projects | /r/rust | 16 Nov 2021
    Would love feedback on on some of the known questions or whatever else is on your mind!
  • trycmd: Snapshot testing for a herd of CLI tests
    1 project | /r/rust | 5 Nov 2021
    The design is inspired by trybuild with thought given to how mdBook books could pull in content so you can verify a code sample, the command for running it, and the output. In considering how to keep clap's website up-to-date, I had this idea and threw it together to see how well it works. Overall, seems good with room for improvement. I'll have to give this a try on a real world program soon.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing jnode and snapbox you can also consider the following projects:

rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.

clap-rs - A full featured, fast Command Line Argument Parser for Rust

biscuit - Biscuit research OS

typos - Source code spell checker

heapless - Heapless, `static` friendly data structures

KEEP - Kotlin Evolution and Enhancement Process

browser - Create Elm programs that run in browsers!

regex-automata - A low level regular expression library that uses deterministic finite automata.

steam-for-linux - Issue tracking for the Steam for Linux beta client

cargo-public-api - List and diff the public API of Rust library crates between releases and commits. Detect breaking API changes and semver violations via CI or a CLI.