jetpack-navigation-ftue-sample VS architecture-components-samples

Not a complex example per say, but I did write this sample and it'd scale as it looks right now, just more packages in core and in features.

The whole circus around login/logout is a mess in jetpack navigation. It assumes a world where your app always has a fixed starting point which imo doesn't make sense with apps where the entire content is behind auth. I recommend checking out https://github.com/Zhuinden/jetpack-navigation-ftue-sample

A simplified variation can be seen in this repo, a LiveData variant with Jetpack stuff can be seen in this repo, my issue with this sample is that as there is no input + debounce + filter + async data load example in it, there is no switchMap (and even for combineTuple, I can use my other helper validateBy here), and those would be key to understanding the difference in terms of expressibility and power...

I have a non-Compose "MVVM + Hilt" sample here

See https://github.com/Zhuinden/jetpack-navigation-ftue-sample/blob/master/app/src/main/java/com/zhuinden/jetpacknavigationdaggersavedstatehandleftueexperiment/features/login/LoginViewModel.kt#L30-L41

Yes it works wonders

https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/ was historically better

uh, maybe https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/tree/a87535608564103423415baddb1e586f0337be44/LiveDataSample/app/src/main/java/com/android/example/livedatabuilder

But Google invented a set of guidelines in "Guide to App Architecture" in 2017 which you can see here in action that after the re-org the new devrels didn't really understand so they ended up making their own version of "clean architecture" where the data layer depends on the domain layer and not vice versa, + never learned how top-level layering like this doesn't even scale ever and they should be creating components, not "layers".

5.) check the https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/ repo for samples (if it is a Google library, and only for some things)

When I take the advanced navigation project and update it's dependency to navigation 2.4.0 we get the working backstack as shown here.

That's still an issue .

Hey guys, Im trying to recognise more about api calls in a contemporary architecture. I am using retrofit with livedata/coroutines to make my api calls, but I'm struggling with error handling. Most of the solutions I find, even in googles own example, includes writing a wrapper around your api request and handle the error that. It seems overly complicated and frankly stupid to do something like that for, what I consider at least, rudimentary functionality. Even with Dart/Flutter, google has made this easy ‏‏‎ with async/await and Futures. Am I being lazy to think that if even google needs to write extra code to solve a common use case, they should probably add it to the framework? I dont know, maybe I just needed venting.. what do you think? google's project: https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/tree/master/GithubBrowserSample

/uj if you're reeeeaaaalyyyy interested, I found them here lol