jester
web-frameworks
jester | web-frameworks | |
---|---|---|
10 | 26 | |
1,547 | 6,900 | |
- | 0.3% | |
5.0 | 9.8 | |
4 months ago | 7 days ago | |
Nim | PHP | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
jester
- Nim v2.0 Released
- Ask HN: Should I learn more languages?
- How would I write a query language in Nim?
- Jester: The sinatra-like web framework for Nim
- Setup a Website with Nim
- Nim Version 1.6 Released
-
Jester and forms
See https://github.com/dom96/jester/blob/master/tests/alltest.nim#L105 and for a simpler syntax you can use the same @ as with params in the URL, so just:
web-frameworks
-
[Web Frameworks Benchmark] How is the FOMO framework handling 45k+ requests more than Swoole the framework it depends on?
Notably it seems that Fomo is using the raw Swoole Server (https://github.com/fomo-framework/framework/blob/a52b75abbd06c0aa6cb1ec47c4011557bc347532/src/Servers/Http.php#L21) rather than the HTTP-specific server wrapper which is what is used in the Swoole benchmark: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/blob/master/php/swoole/start.php
-
Understanding web stack performance
As an Experienced Developer (TM), I'd like to authoritatively know whether a given tech stack is "slow" or "fast", measured in requests per seconds. I'd like to find a way to correctly and objectively measure performance, but most performance suites measure a small thing in isolation. For example, The Benchmarker measures the performance of HTTP APIs, but the requests are super simple (GET request that gets a value, POST request that doesn't do anything but return a value, empty GET).
- Go with Chi has more ram consumption and less req/s than Koa or Fastify
- tools to stress test your website
- Which is the fastest web framework?
- Slower than Go, Java and JS?
-
The NanoMux HTTP router benchmark results
Hi friends. I've opened pull requests for the-benchmarker/web-frameworks and Go HTTP Router Benchmark. Hopefully, they will be merged soon. Here are the benchmark results that I got on my laptop from Julien Schmidt's Go HTTP Router Benchmark. For comparison, I also added Chi, GorillaMux, and HttpRouter.
-
Django Ninja - Help debugging/understanding Internals
The benchmark code: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks
- Passenger 介紹
-
Nim Version 1.6 Released
And the httpbeast code is here: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/tree/maste...
What are some alternatives?
prologue - Powerful and flexible web framework written in Nim
FrameworkBenchmarks - Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project
Nim - Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
wrk - Modern HTTP benchmarking tool
karax - Karax. Single page applications for Nim.
graphql-benchmarks - GraphQL benchmarks using the-benchmarker framework.
nvim-treesitter-textobjects
PHP-CRUD-API - Single file PHP script that adds a REST API to a SQL database
httpbeast - A highly performant, multi-threaded HTTP 1.1 server written in Nim.
Fusio - Open source API management platform
nvim-treesitter - Nvim Treesitter configurations and abstraction layer
ray - Debug with Ray to fix problems faster