jest-extended VS prettier

I recently came across a workaround for this issue by using the expect.toBeOneOf() matcher from the jest-extended library. This matcher allows you to check whether a value matches one of the expected values, including null and undefined.

Yes, a standardized expect would be nice, but care has to be taken to not bloat it.

Currently I use vitest and https://github.com/jest-community/jest-extended which gets you a reasonable amount of usable matchers.

Jest-Extended: Additional Jest matchers

Prettier: An opinionated code formatter that enforces a consistent code style.

Automating code checks with static code analysis allows us to enforce code styling effectively. By integrating tools into our workflow, we can identify errors at an early stage, while coding instead of blocking us at the end. For instance, flake8 checks Python code for style and errors, eslint performs similar checks for JavaScript, and prettier automatically formats code to maintain consistency.

So anyways, I wanted to hook up Emacs with Astro support. For now, I've just been roughing it out there and running Prettier by itself and turning off save on format and auto-complete. It's been scary.

If you're a developer, you're surely familiar with Prettier and ESLint. With over 8 years of existence, they have established themselves as references in the JavaScript ecosystem.

prettier is used to format you text

No formatting inconsistencies: The committed code should follow the organization's code formatting standards(prettier or pretty-quick).

Let’s walk through the steps for a one-time setup to configure husky pre-commit and pre-push hooks, ESLint with code styles conventions, prettier code formatter, and lint-staged. Husky automatically runs a script on each commit or push. This is useful for linting files to enforce code styles that keeps the entire code base following conventions.

GitHub | Website

Prettier: An opinionated code formatter that enforces a consistent code style.

What is Prettier 😎?