jennifer VS go-patterns

We have a repo/library called fasten-sources which is made up of mostly generated code (using dave/jennifer)

Check out my https://github.com/dave/rebecca package for a neat way of building readme docs by embedding Go docs and examples. It generates the readme for https://github.com/dave/jennifer (see https://github.com/dave/jennifer/blob/master/README.md.tpl).

The design of the wrapper functions meant we couldn’t easily unmarshal the CUE value into the wrapper functions. This meant we needed to generate unmarshalled functions for the config types. We use the excellent Jennifer library by Dave (no really; github.com/dave/jennifer) for generating Go files.

I've used https://github.com/dave/jennifer in the past, and been very happy with it.

If specifically for generating Go code, I would suggest you take a look at Jennifer.

I just spent a few hours writing a crapload of boilerplate code generation code with jennifer, if that helps any.

3). GO Patterns

Re Go, there are a lot of lot of good patterns available available, but a lot of them aren’t OOP specific. In fact, both Go and Rust have been influenced by multiple paradigms, including OOP. Like the FAQ says,

What's great is there are really great patterns to follow out there on github (both code patterns https://github.com/tmrts/go-patterns and examples https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go https://github.com/go-kit/kit and for the app itself, https://github.com/golang-standards/project-layout )... and for me a really naggy mentor who insists everything be "idiomatic go"

So I am trying to write a simple generator based on this pattern and the results are a little counter-intuitive. My goal is to create a generator like the above that takes a net.IPNet object and ranges over all net.IP`'s contained in that network. When printing results, I am seeing the same values show up in subsequent executions of the loop and am not sure why. Code follows: