is-buffer VS magnet-uri

Compare is-buffer vs magnet-uri and see what are their differences.

is-buffer

Determine if an object is a Buffer (by feross)
Buffer is-buffer NodeJS Browserify Browser JavaScript
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

magnet-uri

Parse a magnet URI and return an object of keys/values (by webtorrent)
magnet-uri JavaScript Parse NodeJS Browser Browserify Bittorrent Torrent Webtorrent magnet-link
Source Code
webtorrent.io
Suggest alternative
Edit details
SurveyJS
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Our great sponsors
is-buffer magnet-uri
2 1
92 219
- 0.9%
0.0 6.1
over 2 years ago 7 days ago
JavaScript JavaScript
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

is-buffer

Posts with mentions or reviews of is-buffer. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-04.

magnet-uri

Posts with mentions or reviews of magnet-uri. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-10.
  • BitTorrent v2 (2020)
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 Jan 2022
    Unless I'm mistaken, we'd need to settle on a "default" piece size[1] if we were to have automatic upgrading in a client. I learned recently[2] that there's no standard set by the protocol, so Client A might choose a 16KiB piece size, and Client B might take the same files and choose a 64KiB piece size, resulting in two different hashes (v1 or v2!) and thus two peer pools for the same file set.

    1. https://stackoverflow.com/a/65299426/2700296

    2. https://github.com/webtorrent/magnet-uri/pull/43#issuecommen...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing is-buffer and magnet-uri you can also consider the following projects:

trivy - Find vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets, SBOM in containers, Kubernetes, code repositories, clouds and more

picotorrent - A tiny, hackable BitTorrent client.

buffer - The buffer module from node.js, for the browser.

webtorrent - ⚡️ Streaming torrent client for the web

byrnesjs - A JS library to push less trusted code outside Jack's Circle of Trust

qs - A querystring parser with nesting support

ncc - Compile a Node.js project into a single file. Supports TypeScript, binary addons, dynamic requires.

bittorrent-dht - 🕸 Simple, robust, BitTorrent DHT implementation

isBuffer

simDHT-1 - A DHT crawler, very simple, writen by Python.

BiglyBT - Feature-filled Bittorrent client based on the Azureus open source project

tribler - Privacy enhanced BitTorrent client with P2P content discovery

is-buffer vs trivy magnet-uri vs picotorrent is-buffer vs buffer magnet-uri vs webtorrent is-buffer vs byrnesjs magnet-uri vs qs is-buffer vs ncc magnet-uri vs bittorrent-dht is-buffer vs isBuffer magnet-uri vs simDHT-1 magnet-uri vs BiglyBT magnet-uri vs tribler