inxi VS Corinna

You also didn't share your hardware specs, so it's hard to figure out why that might be happening. Begin by installing the inxi tool and then run it in the terminal:

For more information about inxi and how to use it, open a terminal and enter inxi --help or man inxi. Or point your web browser to https://smxi.org/docs/inxi.htm.

https://github.com/smxi/inxi

Upon request, I can post inxi details of my laptop.

>> No, truly utilitarian websites look and function like this: https://smxi.org/docs/inxi.htm

To some extent, the majority determines what is utilitarian. Once Bootstrap achieved mass familiarity, it became utilitarian -- because almost everyone knows how to interact with it, the flow, the location of the information. The site you shared is indeed utilitarian, but it is also unfamiliar and hence makes it more difficult to find the required information at a glance.

INXI : [ https://github.com/smxi/inxi ]

The inxi script (https://github.com/smxi/inxi) can tell you this plus a ton of other stuff. Install inxi, and use something like this to run it and save the results:

this the repository of initial draft:https://github.com/Ovid/Cor

after they proposed this, people debating around this in long time.

Have you been following the developments with Perl's forthcoming OOP engine, Corinna?

You can read about some of the discussions here (that's after the BUILD/BUILDARGS debate). Unfortunately, since much of the discussion took place on IRC, and there's a policy against allowing public logging without explicit permission of the channel owners (I am not an IRC guy, so I'm not one of the channel owners), much of this valuable discussion has been lost to time. I don't wish to repeat this mistake in future projects, but I can't change the past.

I've opened a discussion about revisiting Twigils.

However, I wouldn't shelve your plans to put more time into Moose. The PR for the initial Corinna work is out and while /u/leonerduk's work is great, the PR is huge and there are a few minor issues to deal with. I do not know when the initial Corinna work will be finished and even after that, it will be a couple of years before it's considered "stable."

From the Rationale for Corinna:

It's based on years of experience being the lead designer of the Corinna project and trying to figure out how we can get a version of Moose which is safer and easier to use, including removing a lot of boilerplate. This code:

By now most of you have probably heard about the Corinna project to get modern object-oriented programming in the Perl core. The RFC has been submitted to P5P and it's a slimmed down version of the full specification. It's in seven stages, each building on the last.

Then you'll be happy to know that I've submitted an RFC to the core Perl team to introduce a modern OO model to the language. So far the response has been positive and we already have /u/leonerduk who's committed himself to implement it.