integresql VS rush

For the case of PostgreSQL I've found IntegreSQL and its Javascript client really helpful because it can create a copy of the database per test case, which it helps to write integration tests with real DB calls.

Mocking has some advantages, but so does using a real database, at work we use https://github.com/allaboutapps/integresql and I quite like the approach that integresql has, since it makes possible to have a fresh database with your dummy data for every test without impacting the execution speed (compared to dropping an re-creating the database).

Happy to hear that! When it comes to testing services that depend on PostgreSQL, this is still my preferred solution.

https://github.com/allaboutapps/integresql

disclaimer: author

I haven't had a change to try it yet, but IntegreSQL[0] looks like this on steroids. It allows you to create a template (runs migrations and seed dates), and then uses Postgres's built in cloning functionality to maintain a pool of fresh databases. They claim 500ms to clone a database without the pool, and that the pool pretty much hides the latency entirely.

[0]: https://github.com/allaboutapps/integresql

for python - i have a fully setup template that creates a scratch postgresql db, loads the schema and then tears it down.

its pre-integrated with Black, types, etc

https://github.com/RedCarpetUp/rush