Infection
slim4-skeleton
Our great sponsors
Infection | slim4-skeleton | |
---|---|---|
10 | 7 | |
1,981 | 422 | |
0.9% | - | |
8.5 | 8.5 | |
14 days ago | 20 days ago | |
PHP | PHP | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Infection
-
Who tests the tests? Mutation testing with Infection in PHP
Obviously, we can not generate mutants manually. For that purpose, there are mutation testing utilities. For PHP, we have Infection.
-
PHP libraries and tools
Infection: PHP Mutation Testing library. Plugins: roave/infection-static-analysis-plugin: Static analysis on top of mutation testing - prevents escaped mutants from being invalid according to static analysis bitexpert/captainhook-infection: Captain Hook Plugin to run InfectionPHP only against the changed files of a commit
Infection: PHP Mutation Testing library. Plugins: roave/infection-static-analysis-plugin: Static analysis on top of mutation testing - prevents escaped mutants from being invalid according to static analysis bitexpert/captainhook-infection: Captain Hook Plugin to run InfectionPHP only against the changed files of a commit
-
I created a package to encourage developers in my team to write tests. What do you think? Any feedback? Thanks!
If you want to enforce testing automatically probably the best option is to rely on mutation testing, using Infection. That doesn't just check that the tests cover the code, it checks that if the code was different to what it is then the tests would (usually) fail.
-
Collecting line, branch, and path coverage with PHPUnit
IMO code coverage is a very flawed metric on its own. A high percentage doesn't guarantee that the tests actually test the right things, and it would be much more efficient if mutation testing was used (e.g. Infection). It still uses the generated code coverage reports, but only as a base for its own metrics.
-
Am I writing the right kinds of (unit) tests? See below for an example. Thanks!
For your last edit - you can also add infection which will infect your code with other values, like if you expect a positive number, it will try and inject a negative number - and see what happens - does your code break everything or something. Also it will try to inject false where you might expect a true and many many other things, and yes you will get some weird results from infection, but its a good thing to look at, and atleast check the logs and see why the infection failed at a test.
- I'm looking for "complex" or "advanced" topics that don't get enough coverage
-
Codewars Kata. It uses 100 random tests for a boolean.
The only one that I've used is infection for PHP.
-
Verify your true code coverage by removing lines of PHP code, see if it affects PHPUnit results
That's practically a light form of mutant testing. Have you checked Infection?
slim4-skeleton
-
How to structure Slim/PHP-DI Project?
You can have the container call in a config folder with a file called dependencies or how ever you want. A few existing examples of this is here - Slim calls this app/dependencies in this skeleton project and Odan's Skeleton has this as config/container in their project.
-
Is a framework necessary to create a PHP project?
Yes, as an example, the First Application's business logic (not that it's much) doesn't tie itself to the framework, as one example. Odan's Slim Skeleton, ADR Example (yes, I know you are the author), and the Aura Payload example class can be seen as other examples.
-
Am I writing the right kinds of (unit) tests? See below for an example. Thanks!
Even just the tests in your first link are very useful to see, such as: https://github.com/odan/slim4-skeleton/blob/master/tests/TestCase/Action/Customer/CustomerCreatorActionTest.php
-
I'm new to PHP OOP and looking for feedback on my proposed OOP design structure before I dive in a start coding it. Thanks!
Another option, to me and speaking to the OP as an alternative, it is simpler to add some Data Mappers/Repositories to abstract away the Database code. Good examples is the sample ADR application, Payload library example, Slim 3 First Application, or this Slim 4 Skeleton application
-
How to build a blog using PHP, Slim, Twig Templating Engine and Laravel Illuminate Database
You could also use a Slim Skeleton like Odan's which incorporates much more features to help - docs.
-
Trying to Learn MVC for Laravel but kind of not sold on it , can someone explain/help?
Try Slim again. The setup may be too much, but the concept is the same. Look at the first application or any of the skeleton apps to help (https://github.com/odan/slim4-skeleton for one).
What are some alternatives?
Pest - Pest is an elegant PHP testing Framework with a focus on simplicity, meticulously designed to bring back the joy of testing in PHP.
authorize-slim-4 - Slim 4 Authorization Tutorial
rector-laravel - Rector upgrades rules for Laravel
clean-code-php - :bathtub: Clean Code concepts adapted for PHP
php-mysql-engine - A MySQL engine written in pure PHP
adr - Action-Domain-Responder: a web-specific alternative to Model-View-Controller.
ParaTest - :computer: Parallel testing for PHPUnit
php-mvc - A simple PHP model-view-controller framework, built step-by-step as part of the "Write PHP like a pro: build an MVC framework from scratch" course on Udemy.
psalm-plugin-phpunit - A PHPUnit plugin for Psalm
routing - Maps an HTTP request to a set of configuration variables
churn-php - Discover files in need of refactoring.
slim4-tutorial - Slim 4 Tutorial - Source Code