Apache Answer VS flowchart-fun

In Answer 1.3.0, we’re moving forward to make review and navigation better for you. Here are the features, new improves, and gratitude to all the contributors. Upgrade now and enjoy the reading today.

Slightly offtopic. If anyone is looking for self-hosted alternative to SO then answer [0] is a great choice. I just brought up an instance at [1] if you want to know how it looks like.

[0]: https://github.com/answerdev/answer

[1]: https://selfhosting.quest [IPv6 only]

https://github.com/answerdev/answer#readme is Apache 2 licensed, the sibling comment pointed out that the existing S.O. data is open licensed, but your premise has the same problem every "I'm going to take my ball and go play in the other yard" does: the network effect is very, very real

I keep my notes on https://answer.dev/ self hosted

This is pretty interesting, I didn't know this (answer.dev) was available. I think for my own usage I might get frustrated with having to write the question and answer separately. But a cool thing to add to the list to check out some time, thanks!

Something like: https://github.com/answerdev/answer

https://flowchart.fun recently helped a lot with a project.

- flowchart.fun - paid - https://flowchart.fun

flowchart.fun though!

On https://flowchart.fun I found that I got better overall results by asking GPT for an intermediate syntax that it was less likely to mess up (and easier for me to parse), and then parsing and transforming that syntax to my DSL. The relevant code: https://github.com/tone-row/flowchart-fun/blob/main/api/prom...

https://flowchart.fun is a good one if you're looking for something fast. (It's text-to-diagram)

That's the use-case we're angling for with our GPT integration on flowchart.fun

If you just need the image for your interface, you can generate one very quickly with https://flowchart.fun