imodels VS pycaret

- all domains requiring high interpretability absolutely ignore deep learning at all, and put all their research into traditional ML; see e.g. counterfactual examples, important interpretability methods in finance, or rule-based learning, important in medical or law applications

Next, this variable will be your target and you can use various supervised learning models to answer your question. Since interpretation is key, you can use something from here: https://github.com/csinva/imodels or do some black box models and use shab to understand which features contributed most.

Option 2) fit a model from https://github.com/csinva/imodels on the predicted values of the RF

Despite recent breakthroughs in the formulation and fitting of interpretable models, implementations are frequently challenging to locate, utilize, and compare. imodels solves this void by offering a single interface and implementation for a wide range of state-of-the-art interpretable modeling techniques, especially rule-based methods. imodels is basically a Python tool for predictive modeling that is simple, transparent, and accurate. It gives users a straightforward way to fit and use state-of-the-art interpretable models, all of which are compatible with scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al., 2011). These models can frequently replace black-box models while boosting interpretability and computing efficiency without compromising forecast accuracy. Continue Reading

Our package imodels is expanding our sklearn-compatible set of interpretable models and always looking for new contributors!

Take a look at Pycaret python library. https://github.com/pycaret/pycaret

If you want to try pycaret exists, not sure how similar it is to caret, but it does all the steps in ML project. And Gluon for DL.