i-d-template
A template for IETF internet draft git repositories (by martinthomson)
terminology
A configuration file for in-solidarity-bot that flags some of the terms in the NIST Technical Series Publications Author Instructions and the IETF's list of problematic terminology. (by ietf)
i-d-template | terminology | |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
204 | 61 | |
- | - | |
8.0 | 0.0 | |
about 1 month ago | almost 2 years ago | |
Makefile | ||
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
i-d-template
Posts with mentions or reviews of i-d-template.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
-
Can anyone help me writing my first internet draft ?
While you can start writing out without any further context (with the tooling explained at https://github.com/martinthomson/i-d-template), I'd recommend you first look for a working group to place this with. Go check the list of WGs at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/, get in contact via the mailing list, and ask to present what you're working on during an interim meeting. Worst case, if it doesn't fit, they can tell you where next to take it.
terminology
Posts with mentions or reviews of terminology.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
-
Companies use dark patterns to keep you subscribed
The IETF for one https://github.com/ietf/terminology/pull/9
My intent wasn't to appeal to authority though. I think it's a better term.
-
Why I'm losing faith in UX
You can propose to https://github.com/ietf/terminology
What are some alternatives?
When comparing i-d-template and terminology you can also consider the following projects:
author-tools - Author Tools
contributor_covenant - Pledge your respect and appreciation for contributors of all kinds to your open source project.
ops-drafts - Applicability and Manageability Statements
http-core - Core HTTP Specifications
ietf-reviewtool - Download and review IETF documents, such as Internet-Drafts or RFCs.
rfc-servant
collapse-lingo - A collapse glossary