hydrogen
pulsar
Our great sponsors
hydrogen | pulsar | |
---|---|---|
6 | 91 | |
3,905 | 2,939 | |
0.2% | 4.4% | |
0.0 | 9.9 | |
4 days ago | 4 days ago | |
TypeScript | JavaScript | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
hydrogen
-
Trouble with Hydrogen Plug-In (error text included)
Hydrogen got an update to fix this issue, but it was never published on Pulsar's backend. You can install it with pulsar -p https://github.com/nteract/hydrogen.git -t v2.16.5
-
Pulsar โ A Community-Led Hyper-Hackable Text Editor
Folks who know Pulsar and Zed internals: which one of them is more likely to gain support for Atom packages? I find Hydrogen[1] invaluable as a data science scratchpad since it supports python/r/julia/etc under a common interface via jupyter, and have been unable to construct a comparable workflow in vscode or any other editor [using scripts as opposed to notebooks, which i find far too bloated].
[1]: https://github.com/nteract/hydrogen
-
Switched to VSCode... I miss Atom :(
Finally, newer Pulsar versions (from the master branch on the CI) allow you to install ppm and pulsar from the command-line. We also fixed some of the issues on installing a package directly from github - for example, you can run "pulsar -p https://github.com/nteract/hydrogen.git -t v2.16.5" to install hydrogen on tag v2.16.5 now (tested on Linux and Silicon mac). Package publication is an ongoing process - we fixed lots of issues of the first version, and now it's working for some people, but we are still aware that we have some bugs too... it's hard because we need to "reverse engineer" the old API :(
-
Atom Was Archived Today
But with Hydrogen you could do that in a regular Python script without needing to create a notebook or think in terms of cells. There's an example of this in the Hydrogen readme: https://github.com/nteract/hydrogen#hydrogen-
-
Sunsetting Atom Text Editor
I personally found Atom + Hydrogen [0] to be the most productive interactive Python environment I've ever used. I really want to see VSCode adopt some way to run a Jupyter kernel for a Python file (with a notebook UI) and have rich results in line with the code (i.e. not a terminal output off to the right side of the screen).
[0] https://github.com/nteract/hydrogen
pulsar
-
Show HN: Open-source alternatives to tools You pay for
You may be thinking of Pulsar (<https://pulsar-edit.dev/>)?
- Python Text Editor
- Armed with a big ol' can of Raid: Pulsar 1.110.0 is available now!
-
Open-Source Washing
> VSCodium is not "designed" to be less functional, since it is a project maintained by developers who are unaffiliated with Microsoft.
In today's (OSS) world, employment or affiliation doesn't matter much. Microsoft can propose what they want and get what they want from the project, at the end of the day. I don't think these independent maintainers have power to say "No" (if a VSCodium developer can chime in here, I'd love to be stand corrected), or they risk VSCodium to be forked to VSCodiumX, by developers who are friendlier to the megacorp which loves Linux.
Yes, VSCodium is a node to Chromium. "-ium" has a ring akin to "-ish" in today's conjecture. Freemium - Free-ish but not. Chromium - Chrome-ish but not. VSCodium - VSCode-ish, but not. This might be curse in the naming, but it feels like that, at least for me.
The blog post I linked quotes a tweet which supports what I'm saying, heck even the blog post does a much better job of detailing what I was trying to say here in my previous comments.
To circle back, the problem with -ium projects are, they are effectively banned from participating in the main ecosystem which drives these projects forward, and to be in "The Ecosystem", you need to use the closed source versions with pervasive data collection and whatnot. Heck, even Google abuses Chromium with "Experiments and Proposals", which they use to politely yet forcefully push the web to the places they want. VSCodium is the same getaway drug and test vessel for Microsoft.
Lure with Open Source version, trap with closed source version for "Full Benefits" (for the company, because user is the product).
> You're entitled to your own opinion, but Atom was developed by GitHub...
Yes & yes.
> which was acquired by Microsoft.
Yes.
> It doesn't help that Atom was discontinued last year, with the final version having been released in March 2022
However, it's forked as Pulsar [0], which I meant by "current form" in my previous comment. Again, it's MIT licensed, and that's not my favorite, but at least it's not a company editor now.
Atom's original developers started to build Zed, which is worst of both worlds currently (Open source with a closed backend, plus "All your data belong to us" clause).
At the end of the day, from my perspective "-ium" projects and their sanitized versions are just open-core versions of the "main tools" developed from them.
Just because these versions somehow work, and have a permissive license doesn't make them open source in the meta sense. Pedantically they are open source software, yes, but they are just the "Open Core" or Demo/Shareware versions of the tools which companies use to strange to ecosystems.
This is just enshittification of open source in my eyes.
More power to you if you're happy with the -ium tools, but I'd rather use truly free software (Like Eclipse), or use completely honest closed source software (like BBEdit), instead of using tools designed to look like open source but not.
[0]: https://pulsar-edit.dev/
-
Chime โ Capable. Focused. Fast. An open source editor for macOS
I thought spiritual successor to Atom is Pulsar. https://github.com/pulsar-edit/pulsar
-
Help: Atom Alternatives/Copy-Pasting Scripts
Pulsar has a TTS package, for those who were very comfortable in Atom.
-
Libre-friendly IDEs?
In addition to the already mentioned Emacs, I would check Pulsar, the Atom successor.
-
Im new to lua, what are the best Lua IDE?
Community-led fork of Atom
-
Clarification question
Also, don't worry - we understand that there's documentation lacking on the "extend Pulsar" part and on package creation, but we're working on it. We're also working on better ways to test, document, and create packages (and grammars - see, for example, how we usually tested grammars in the past and how we're migrating to for example), so it's just a matter of time, really.
-
Best FOSS text editor like atom?
Our website is https://pulsar-edit.dev/, feel free to check out or Discord server if you want to come and say hi or have any questions - we are a friendly bunch.
What are some alternatives?
vite-material-ui - A Vite starter template for React, TypeScript, and MUI
Visual Studio Code - Visual Studio Code
shopify-theme-lab - Shopify theme development environment using Liquid, Vue and Tailwind CSS. Built on top of Shopify CLI ๐งช
micro-editor - A modern and intuitive terminal-based text editor
SvelteKit - web development, streamlined
vscodium - binary releases of VS Code without MS branding/telemetry/licensing
astro - The web framework for content-driven websites. โญ๏ธ Star to support our work!
Launch.nvim - ๐ Launch.nvim is modular starter for Neovim.
crosis - A JavaScript client that speaks Replit's container protocol
Atom - :atom: The hackable text editor
Liquid - Liquid markup language. Safe, customer facing template language for flexible web apps.
atom - :atom: Community build of the hackable text editor