hptx VS Harbor

The distributed transaction solutions of hptx and dbpack are the same, and both are driven by ETCD. The transaction data is rolled back through the asynchronous SQL compensation mechanism. After testing, on macbook pro, hptx can coordinate 38 distributed transactions per second, at the same time, using the XA protocol to coordinate distributed transactions can only coordinate 26 transactions per second.

cat << EOF wget \ https://github.com/goharbor/harbor/releases/download/v2.9.4/\ harbor-offline-installer-v2.9.4.tgz EOF

Now that you know a little more about Cosign, Notary, and DCT, we will take it one step further by using one of these tools: Cosign. For this example, we will use the simple Docker registry:2 reference image to run a simple registry. In a real-world scenario, a managed registry such as Harbor, Amazon ECR, Docker Hub, etc.

Have a look at harbor, you can also use it to follow the same methods for helm charts etc.

Or for something more advanced https://goharbor.io/

Look at https://goharbor.io/

You can host your own image repo if your feeling feisty. Harbor is a graduated project from the CNCF and they are also working on a new implementation called Dragonfly. https://goharbor.io/

Does anybody know whether there could be something like an open/libre container registry?

Maybe the cloud native foundation or the linux foundation could provide something like this to prevent vendor lock-ins?

I was coincidentially trying out harbor again over the last days, and it seems nice as a managed or self-hosted alternative. [1] after some discussions we probably gonna go with that, because we want to prevent another potential lock-in with sonarpoint's nexus.

Does anybody have similar migration plans?

[1] https://goharbor.io

2) Harbor instance registry