examples VS metriql

Honeycomb

I haven't used anything else, but I'll gladly shill for https://honeycomb.io.

With all of this in place I went a step further and added Opentelemetry to track the stats of how often the routine was being triggered on Honeycomb.

Events can be used in many meaningful ways. The Event subsystem of B is pretty much a co-evolution of what honeycomb.io offers, but implemented completely differently - it is on bare-metal, and hence a lot cheaper. Because of that, B never subsampled, but always kept a full low of all events anywhere, no exceptions.

It should be noted that this is a very oblique ad for http://honeycomb.io. That in no way impugns the content of the post, and in fact, it's given the content of the post that I feel compelled to point out that, ultimately, this is an ad. Because what is sales and advertising, anyway? It's just a way to get you to buy a product, and you can't do that if you've never even heard about the product. I'm not currently in the market for an observability solution (something something splunk) but if I were, I've now heard of them.

The question though, is why does money ruin everything? The naive questions of an open source zealot to a proprietary software salesperson are one thing, but since we all need money to live, why does money being part of the equation (eg if someone was getting paid to post here) ruin things? Would a "donate to open source" button be more successful if the donate text is "buy me a coffee", "buy me a beer", or "upgrade my beer from Coors light"?

https://xkcd.com/2347/ was and is true, and if we don't figure out a way to change that, I don't really see a future for open source.

Very cool to see honeycomb.io is doing that. I'm about to embark on my distributed tracing learning journey, this makes me want to try honeycomb right away.

Caveat: I work for a vendor in the O11y space (https://honeycomb.io) as a Developer Advocate, however, this advice is generic, not specific to our platform.

I spent Day 2 at the Colony Club to attend OTel Unplugged. This event was sponsored by Lightstep, Honeycomb, New Relic, Splunk, Dynatrace, Crowdstrike, and NGINX. I came into the event not knowing what to expect. I can sometimes clamp up when I’m around folks that I don’t know, but because I was helping with the event check-in, I got to say hello to a number of the attendees, which helped break the ice. And it turns out that there were a lot of names that I recognized from my work in the OTel community, and it was nice to connect in person with folks whom I’d only previously met through Slack or Zoom.

It's no surprise that my apps are mostly written using Sanic as I'm pretty involved with the project. I've been wanting to start testing honeycomb out as well, so it seemed the perfect opportunity to try out.

Some of the companies that operate in space are Cube Dev; Transform(currently acquired by dbt); metriql. See more companies at https://www.moderndatastack.xyz/companies/metrics-store.

Presto is pretty successful but its focus is to be distributed query engine, not a proxy layer for the existing query engines. We use Trino ( formerly Presto) as our query layer and do something similar to Hydra at Metriql [1] with a fairly different use-case. Data people provide a semantic layer with the mecrics and expose them to 18+ downstream tools.

[1]: https://metriql.com

This is why metrics store tooling have started appearing recently (e.g. TransformData, SuperGrain, Metriql, dbt Metrics) - to solve the problem of this table / metric disorganization across an org's data landscape.

We're using Superset to enable our analysts to explore our clients' SEM/SEO/analytics data. It also posts alerts to Slack when, say, the daily session count of a website isn't what was expected given the historical data.

Yeah, it's a little rough to get going, but once it is, we've found it to be a really powerful (and actively developed!) BI tool. It's even better with dbt + MetriQL [0], which can automatically sync Superset's dataset metadata directly with properties you set up in dbt.

Adding custom visualizations is much harder than it should be, but they're very much aware of that, and working to address it. Their Slack community is super-helpful, too.

[0]: https://metriql.com

As a current Looker power-user, this looks really solid.

One thing I’m not sure about though: can you use the metrics outside of the native tool, and if so how?

That is, I see Looker as a BI tool, not a metrics layer, since you mainly use the metrics you define inside Looker, not in other tools. On the other hand, something like MetriQL[0] is a pure metrics layer that can supposedly be used anywhere.

Is this both? If so, some better documentation around how to use the metrics layer would be helpful (or maybe I just didn’t look in the right place).

[0] https://metriql.com/

3. Define metrics in one place on top of your data models and expose the metrics to all the data tools. (This layer is new, and we're tapping it at https://metriql.com)

We use BSL license and metriql is free with a single database target. If you want to connect multiple dbt projects in a single deployment, you need to go through the sales cycle.

We work with ETL vendors that use metriql to make revenue with our BI tool integrations so we picked BSL license to be able to structure our business model in a way that you should be required to pay only if you're reselling metriql to your customers.

You can find the license here: https://github.com/metriql/metriql