helm VS crossplane

Helm Helm is widely used for deploying applications to Kubernetes through "charts" (pre-configured Kubernetes resources). It greatly simplifies managing Kubernetes resources and automates the deployment of complex applications. site

Install Helm: You can use a package manager or download the binary from the Helm website.

Deploying Keycloak in a Kubernetes environment using Helm has several benefits:

What is Helm

Pro Tip: Use Helm charts to manage Kubernetes configurations and deployments more efficiently.

Helm

In this lab, we deploy kube-ops-view via *Helm *. Helm is a tool for managing Kubernetes charts, which means a preconfigured Kubernetes resource package. The purpose of managing charts with Helm is to manage various manifest files easily.

You might want to choose a different name and branding. [Helm](https://helm.sh/) is already a package manager for Kubernetes with pretty similar branding.

Download page: https://github.com/helm/helm/releases

I don't plan on covering Helm here as I think it adds complexity over already quite complex K8s manifests. Surely it might be useful for large-scale stuff, but let's keep things simple here. I have combined knowledge from the articles with the updated charts in order to created a trimmed-down version of the required manifests (it would be good to add liveliness and readiness probes though):

The most obvious alternative to Pulumi is Terraform. But hey, keep an eye out for OpenTofu, an upcoming open-source alternative following a BSL license change. Crossplane is another alternative for those who enjoy building infrastructure using Kubernetes CRDs. Check out more details below.

did anyone adopt in production https://crossplane.io ?

- https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane/blob/master/design/one-pager-composition-environment.md

In the overall scheme of things , look at services like backstage.io , crossplane.io and opslevel.com to get ideas. This is not necessarily an endorsement of the services. If all you want is to handle cloud resources and that's it, Terraform can be enough with what ever flavor of web technologies you and your team are comfortable with and can support it along the way. Doesn't take much to create a js based website to collect data from a form, or use other means to collecting data as long as its recorded and transparent for accountability.

XRs are written in a fully declarative manner. And when I am building my XR from underlying managed resources provided by some crossplane provider I need to parametrize resources, use conditionals and create arrays of resuorces The issues of declarativeness in the world of automation are well known- we typically resort to some form of templating and we invent some imperative expressions into that templating language/format. This is currently not very well supported with Crossplane however Crossplane team realizes this issue and they are conteptualizing solution here

I have an idea for a project that would interface with Crossplane. The project has some code that would save tons of time if I could use it directly in my project, but it is located in the internal directory. I can't import the modules directly, but the project is open sourced under an Apache 2.0 license, so the code itself is available for use under that license.

There are always new projects like crossplane that sit on top on architecture systems like terraform, vagrant. The pressure to abstract away any sort of resources is mounting, companies can save a lot by for example by alt hosting S3 endpoints. The train is going the direction not to tie anything to a specific platform implementation if its not a must. Most of the companies I work with use AWS as a hosting provider, but Microsoft for github and related CI matters. As I learned, AWS quality is very dependent on location, eu-central-1 is dead stable for our use cases serving about millions requests a day.