hel VS vite

Toolchain-independent sdk-based module federation hel-micro

helux is a zhuang't that encourages service injection and supports responsive changes to react. Its predecessor is concent (a high-performance state management framework for Vue-like development experience), but concent itself needs to be compatible with class and function to maintain a consistent syntax, and for its setup function, internal The amount of code is too large. After compression, there are more than 70 more than KB, and the API is exposed too much, which leads to a sharp increase in learning difficulty. It was originally designed as a lightweight react data flow solution that encourages service injection, supports responsive changes, and supports dependency collection.

It is highly recommended to try hel micro(https://github.com/tnfe/hel) in turbo，cause hel-micro is a runtime module federation SDK which is unrelated to tool chain, so any tool system can access module federation technology in seconds .

The module federation can play an even more powerful role in the construction of super-large js projects, and the module deployment efficiency and sharing efficiency of giant applications will be easily solved. At the same time, it is matched with micro-container related frameworks (such as wujie, rame), etc., to ensure your isolation operation requirements. Escort, welcome to star hel-micro, understand and use it.

As of this writing, initializing a Hattip project requires some manual commands. However, keep in mind that a zero-config development environment based on Vite is in the works.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 4200, } })

For the frontend of "I Disappear," I leverage the automated build & deploy system provided by Netlify, which seamlessly integrates with Vite. This setup ensures that every deployment is optimized for performance, utilizing Vite’s modern build tools to enhance speed and efficiency.

Given our team's collective proficiency within the React ecosystem, we decided to leverage this expertise for our project. Initially, we contemplated utilizing Next.js; however, due to the limited practical experience with this technology among key engineers and the pressing timeline to develop the first prototype, we opted for a Single Page Application(SPA) approach. For bundling, we selected Vite, primarily due to its super fast build times, simplicity of configuration, and potential for a nearly seamless transition to server-side rendering.

We are continuing to add new project templates for various types of projects, and we've recently created one for the infamous combination of React with Vite tooling.

Vite focuses on providing an extremely fast development server and workflow speed in web development. It uses its own ES module imports during development, speeding up the startup time.

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })

I am currently utilizing Vite:

Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/