hel VS Immer

Toolchain-independent sdk-based module federation hel-micro

helux is a zhuang't that encourages service injection and supports responsive changes to react. Its predecessor is concent (a high-performance state management framework for Vue-like development experience), but concent itself needs to be compatible with class and function to maintain a consistent syntax, and for its setup function, internal The amount of code is too large. After compression, there are more than 70 more than KB, and the API is exposed too much, which leads to a sharp increase in learning difficulty. It was originally designed as a lightweight react data flow solution that encourages service injection, supports responsive changes, and supports dependency collection.

It is highly recommended to try hel micro(https://github.com/tnfe/hel) in turbo，cause hel-micro is a runtime module federation SDK which is unrelated to tool chain, so any tool system can access module federation technology in seconds .

The module federation can play an even more powerful role in the construction of super-large js projects, and the module deployment efficiency and sharing efficiency of giant applications will be easily solved. At the same time, it is matched with micro-container related frameworks (such as wujie, rame), etc., to ensure your isolation operation requirements. Escort, welcome to star hel-micro, understand and use it.

```

It looks like it’s mutating, but both the reducers and update() uses immer* under the hood, so we still respect immutability under the hood.

Cami supports redux devtools so you can use that for time-travel debugging too!

—-

* https://github.com/immerjs/immer

I heard that immutability libraries like immer.js [0] help with this. Anyone go this way and had good success? Is this 'the way'?

[0]: https://immerjs.github.io/immer/

So, that's what we built, and we built it in the most obvious way — using JavaScript Proxy objects to track mutations and reflect those changes across Appsmith’s framework. Initially things looked good — it worked, aside from a few hacks to make some data types work with map and set, and we were following the example of other projects that had similar requirements. If it was good enough for them, it should be good enough for us, right?

But is immer really the ultimate answer? The performance problem of immer is more prominent in large arrays and deep-level object scenarios. See this issue description, many authors in the community began to try to make breakthroughs, and noticed that structura and mutative, I found that it is indeed many times faster than immer as they said, but it still fails to solve the problem of both fast speed and good development experience. I will analyze the two issues in detail below.

I like immer for this kind of thing: https://github.com/immerjs/immer

It gives you immutable updates without getting bogged down in FP abstractions.

I've always been a huge fan of immer for these case. For your code, it would simply turn into setGridData((prev) => produce(prev, draft => applyChanges(changes, draft)) but I recommend you go over their documentation to fully understand how it works

If you're trying to make things actually immutable, Object.freeze and deep copies can clutter things up pretty good, have you considered using something like immer? (https://immerjs.github.io/immer/)

If you want to set up from Context, Zustand is your best bet. It offers an extremely simple API that lets you create a store with values and functions. Then, you can access that store from anywhere in your application to read and write values. Reactivity included! If you want to store nested object data in your store, consider using Immer alongside Zustand to easily change nested state.