haskell-names
purescript
| haskell-names | purescript | |
|---|---|---|
| - | 55 | |
| 52 | 8,755 | |
| - | 0.2% | |
| 3.6 | 4.8 | |
| 5 months ago | 2 months ago | |
| Haskell | Haskell | |
| BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
haskell-names
We haven't tracked posts mentioning haskell-names yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
purescript
-
Type-Machine
I wish for a language that combines the strengths of Haskell and Typescript. I suppose PureScript isn't that?
https://www.purescript.org/
-
An Ode to TypeScript Enums
When I see this it makes me want to run for ReasonML/ReScript/Elm/PureScript.
Sum types (without payloads on the instances they are effectively enums) should not require a evening filling ceremonial dance event to define.
https://reasonml.github.io/
https://rescript-lang.org/
https://elm-lang.org/
https://www.purescript.org/
(any I forgot?)
It's nice that TS is a strict super set of JS... But that's about the only reason TS is nice. Apart from that the "being a strict super set" hampers TS is a million and one ways.
To my JS is too broken to fix with a strict super set.
-
How I host Elm web applications with GitHub Pages
A web application makes use of these same ingredients, i.e. HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, but it uses significantly more JavaScript. As the JavaScript powering your web application grows in size it can bring with it a variety of problems that a few languages, like TypeScript, ReScript, PureScript, and Elm, have attempted to solve. Each of the aforementioned compile to JavaScript languages have their pros and cons but it is beyond the scope of this article to get into those details. Suffice it to say, my preference is Elm. It is also not the goal of this article to convince you to use Elm but only to show you how Elm fits into the flow of creating a web application and hosting it on GitHub Pages. So let's continue by adding Elm to our project.
- Learning Elm by porting a medium-sized web front end from React (2019)
- Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.
-
Is there a better way to do read-only types
Unless you want to switch to https://www.purescript.org/.
-
Why I'm Leaving Elm
PureScript[1][2] seems pretty alive these days. From my relatively small, self-contained experiments, it's a lot more flexible and expressive than Elm at the expense of (maybe?) being a bit harder to learn up-front.
[1]: https://www.purescript.org/
[2]:https://github.com/purescript/purescript
- (strongly typed) functional language compilers running in browser
-
purescript VS purs-eval - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 2 Mar 2023
What are some alternatives?
Elm - Compiler for Elm, a functional language for reliable webapps.
elm-reactor
frp-arduino - Arduino programming without the hassle of C.
cryptol - Cryptol: The Language of Cryptography
rescript - ReScript is a robustly typed language that compiles to efficient and human-readable JavaScript.