hedgehog VS ghc-prof-flamegraph

Compare hedgehog vs ghc-prof-flamegraph and see what are their differences.

CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers
Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.
www.nutrient.io
featured
hedgehog ghc-prof-flamegraph
5 -
682 77
0.1% -
6.6 0.0
2 months ago over 2 years ago
Haskell Haskell
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

hedgehog

Posts with mentions or reviews of hedgehog. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-07-04.
  • The sad state of property-based testing libraries
    21 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Jul 2024
    > - rose tree "integrated shrinking" (eg. Hedgehog) follows the constraints of the generators, but has issues with monadic bind.

    We're at the limits of my amateur knowledge, but I believe this is a fundamental limitation of monadic bind/generators. Instead, you should prefer applicative generators for ideal shrinking. https://github.com/hedgehogqa/haskell-hedgehog/issues/473#is...

    In other words, applicative generators do not use "results of generators to dispatch to another generator", but instead shrinking is optimal due to the "parallel" nature of applicatives (I'm using "parallel" in the monadic sense, and not the sense of article's "threading" sense).

  • Monthly Hask Anything (May 2022)
    4 projects | /r/haskell | 3 May 2022
    I've had some PRs open on hedgehog for one and two months respectively. It looks like the maintainer isn't currently very active, which is fair enough. This isn't about criticizing him, and I'm not trying to take over the repo.
  • Monthly Hask Anything (February 2022)
    4 projects | /r/haskell | 1 Feb 2022
    Testing libraries like hedgehog often run tests in parallel, so you may find related issues to work on.
  • Mutation Testing
    5 projects | /r/programming | 13 Apr 2021
    Haskell has QuickCheck and Hedgehog, and dotnet has both as well. F# is favored, but there's C# interop.

ghc-prof-flamegraph

Posts with mentions or reviews of ghc-prof-flamegraph. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning ghc-prof-flamegraph yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing hedgehog and ghc-prof-flamegraph you can also consider the following projects:

QuickCheck - Automatic testing of Haskell programs.

smallcheck - Test your Haskell code by exhaustively checking its properties

tasty - Modern and extensible testing framework for Haskell

quickcheck-arbitrary-adt - Typeclass for generating a list of each instance of a sum type's constructors

StrictCheck - Keep your laziness in check!

CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers
Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.
www.nutrient.io
featured

Did you know that Haskell is
the 25th most popular programming language
based on number of references?