haskell-companies VS fslang-suggestions

There's quite a few finance companies listed on this haskell-companies list (and also 7 different blockchain companies). Standard Chartered presented how they use Haskell at HIW 2021.

This is a useful list: https://github.com/erkmos/haskell-companies

There are only a handful of industry resources using Haskell, despite being a fully-fledged production language used by dozens of companies.

Here is the list of companies where Haskell is used.

You can find a list of some companies that use Haskell (some based in the US) here: https://github.com/erkmos/haskell-companies

luck i guess, i had no idea of it's existance until i started working there (as an intern). 4 years later i fucking love it, best thing that ever happened to me. r/haskell has some postings from time to time, and they also made a list of companies that use it. I work in chile btw.

Trying to extend this https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-suggestions/issues/1089 to have two generics:

Basically, what I've made in Spiral. There is even a F# issue to improve the syntax.

Not currently supported but it's an open language suggestion that's likely to end up in F#. https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-suggestions/issues/506

Re: the argument accessor shorthand, there seems to be a proposal for exactly that (using _ instead of &): https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-suggestions/issues/506#issu...

I found this post (https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-suggestions/issues/975) which is about the same thing, but I'm confused as to what the final resolution was. There was mention of a taskSeq, but I can't find much info on that.

An issue in FSharp suggestions

F# doesn’t currently seem to support source generators.

"Blessed" literals: only FSharp.List and System.Array have a built-in collection syntax in the language ([ ] and [| |]). Only FSharp.List has a special pattern matching constructor (::). The language itself shouldn't favor a particular type over another: it should be possible, at the library level, to write the same code but using different collection types (related discussion here).

I mostly write F# so I can only speak for F#, but if you want you can create a module which extends Seq to add the OCaml names. I suspect the same is possible in OCaml. The authors are not trying to impede compatibility, but compatibility is not a goal. If you value compatibility, or adhering to ML norms, and you use F#, I recommend you (kindly) advocate for it in relevant issues on the F# language discussion repo. https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-suggestions/issues