handlebars.c VS bake

Compare handlebars.c vs bake and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
handlebars.c bake
1 2
33 23
- -
10.0 4.7
over 1 year ago 3 months ago
C Shell
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

handlebars.c

Posts with mentions or reviews of handlebars.c. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-12.
  • The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Makefiles
    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Aug 2022
    Yes, I used autotools[0]. It's definitely hairier than plain make, but you get a lot of useful features on top of it. There's thousands of examples all over the internet so it's easy to reference them.

    I like the elegance of pure make, and do use it when appropriate, but I wouldn't really want to reimplement the things autotools does myself in it.

    [0]: https://github.com/jbboehr/handlebars.c/blob/master/configur...

bake

Posts with mentions or reviews of bake. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-12.
  • The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Makefiles
    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Aug 2022
    Honestly, I only find Makefiles useful when I have a tiny C/C++ project and need stuff just to compile quickly and easily without the overhead of a real build system.

    For literally everything else, I found myself using it more as a task runner - and Make doesn't do a great job at it. You end up mixing Bash and Make variables, string interpolation, and it becomes really messy, really fast. Not to mention the footguns associated with Make.

    I found bake (https://github.com/hyperupcall/bake) to suit my needs (disclaimer: I wrote it). It's literally just a Bash script with all the boilerplate taken care of you - what a task runner is meant to be imo

  • Basalt: The rock-solid Bash package manager
    2 projects | /r/bash | 26 May 2022
    Nope, I didn't add that in bakefiles because it seemed like supporting that in a declarative way would be overkill. Very simple dependencies can just be ran manually just as you think they could (calling `task.dev`), but I intentionally didn't want to bake in support for longer ones (at least not right now)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing handlebars.c and bake you can also consider the following projects:

checkexec - CLI tool to conditionally execute commands only when files in a dependency list have been updated. Like `make`, but standalone.

tclmake - Partial make clone in pure Tcl

make-booster - Utility routines to simplify using GNU make and Python

bash-object - Manipulate heterogenous data hierarchies in Bash.

sub - a delicious way to organize programs

just - 🤖 Just a command runner

Airflow - Apache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflows

dagger - Application Delivery as Code that Runs Anywhere

docker-flask-example - A production ready example Flask app that's using Docker and Docker Compose.