hamsterbase VS SingleFile

Official website address: https://hamsterbase.com/

I also maintained a project at an extremely low cost, other than the $99 for the mac app store and the domain, my other costs were $0.

This is an read-it-later app https://hamsterbase.com/

• Official website deployment: render.com

• Code hosting: GitHub’s private repository

• Issues management: GitHub issue

• Product release: GitHub release , dockerhub

• Email: Free email service from larksuite.com

• Document management: logseq, a free, open-source note-taking software.

This is the first landing page I developed with vitepress, do you think this page makes all the features clear.

https://hamsterbase.com/

Couldn't agree more.

I just developed a local-first read later software using CRDT technology. aka

https://hamsterbase.com/

and designed the architecture of the software from scratch.

1. all data is stored locally, one page corresponds to one CRDT file. CRDT file is a single source of information

I have been developing my knowledge management tools (https://hamsterbase.com) for the past year (It is now the Chinese New Year.) and this is what I have gained in the last year.

1. collect 5 paying users

Since we don't have an account system, the payments are more like donations. There are currently 5 paying users.

2. release 6 minor versions

From version 0.1 on 23 April 22 to version 0.6 on 21 January 23. 3.

3. Get ? Users.

You can try https://github.com/hamsterbase/hamsterbase

That's interesting. I have been saving articles as PDF files, which is browser-independent, but useful just for search and reference, a nuisance to quote/copy-and-paste.

If I search only the computer, I don't get results from EBay and Amazon at the top. The idea of keeping the knowledge base separate from the primary notes is a good idea. In my case, that knowledge base is the file system, and the primary notes are whatever I choose.

When I was using Evernote, the inbox was the knowledge base and notebooks were the focus. I just had too many different potential projects going on to manage this well.

Looking to focus.

I'll revisit Firefox and SingleFile.

Explanation of the zip file inside.

https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq...

[2] https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq...

I agree it would be "great" a complete website in the ZIP. I think this is technically possible, someone just have to code it.

[1] https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile#singlefile

Singlefile [1] works pretty well for me for that use case.

It has the added advantage that the file format is just plain HTML, and together with “reader mode” in most browsers, it’s a great way to save long-form text or other mostly static pages for later reference.

It obviously doesn’t work for very dynamic pages, let alone web apps.

[1] https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile

I’ve tried all the third party services for archiving interesting things over the years but nothing beats saving everything to your local filesystem using [SingleFile](https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile) and using a full-text search front over the directory (something like Houdahspot, for example).

If you want to save them as a file locally you could use something like SingleFile. You could also put the URL for each wiki into archive.org's Save Page Now so that anyone can access it. Either way, without scripting, you'll have to do some manual labor to get the URL for each wiki.

For small numbers of pages, the SingleFile[0] extension for Firefox (WebExtension) is pretty handy. It's not "archival quality", though, if that's the kind of "archiving" you're doing.

[0] https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile