gsh VS oursh

Compare gsh vs oursh and see what are their differences.

gsh

A POSIX shell for Windows. (by AdaCore)

oursh

Your comrade through the perilous world of UNIX. (by nixpulvis)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
gsh oursh
1 2
98 67
- -
0.0 5.8
9 months ago 2 months ago
C Rust
- MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

gsh

Posts with mentions or reviews of gsh. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-10.
  • A Better Shell
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 Sep 2021
    This has already been done in ADA. It was designed for better performance than the Cygwin shell.

    https://archive.fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/ada_shell/

    https://github.com/AdaCore/gsh

    You could also use the busybox port of the Almquist shell, if you can refrain from most bashisms.

    https://frippery.org/busybox/

oursh

Posts with mentions or reviews of oursh. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-10-23.
  • Nsh: A fish/bash-like Posix shell in Rust
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Oct 2021
    There is also https://github.com/nixpulvis/oursh which wants to be POSIX compatible with its own extensions. Actually I would prefer if a new shell focuses on bash compatibility.

    If features are integrated, then I would probably want to have something about error handling because it is difficult to get right in bash even with shellcheck¹ and gets just worse when things run in parallel.

    ¹ https://www.shellcheck.net/

  • A Better Shell
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 Sep 2021
    A lot of this has to do with the integration between the Terminal and the Shell. A project that came up recently that seems to take on a few of the issues is https://blog.warp.dev/how-warp-works. I've been meaning to write up a proper critique of this project at some point, but I keep getting side-tracked.

    I also want a replacement for `fish`, however it's a pretty tall order to implement what I have in mind, and I got a bit stuck trying to find the right abstractions for background job management in Rust (there's a lot going on). But I genuinely believe a multi-language shell with POSIX support will finally allow us to move forward in the terminal environment. UI/UX issues like ctrl-c, window management, and everything else can be implemented as derivations from POSIX, or additions.

    While somewhat tangential to the main thread of this post, I'll still leave my (incomplete) shell here for anyone who's interested. https://github.com/nixpulvis/oursh. The README has a decent description of features I want off the bat, and there's a bunch of design level issues in the tracker.

    I'll never accept the death of the Terminal environment.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing gsh and oursh you can also consider the following projects:

homebrew-emacs-plus - Emacs Plus formulae for the Homebrew package manager

busybox-w32 - WIN32 native port of BusyBox.