graphql-request VS Gatsby

The aws-sigv4-fetch package can be integrated into GraphQL libraries like graphql-request. For example, you can pass the signedFetch function as the custom fetch option:

For Next.js projects, one of the options can be the typescript-graphql-request plugin. Under the hood this plugin works with the graphql-request library — a minimal, flexible, and easy-to-use GraphQL client. With typescript-graphql-request, we generate an SDK that is fully typed and allowing us to make strongly-typed GraphQL requests. This nicely integrates with data fetching in Next.js Server Components, enabling us to pre-render pages with data from Storyblok.

but i don't want to use that external library

An example of a Snowflake API request using JavaScript. This example uses the graphql-request library to issue the actual GraphQL request. Install the dependency:

I mentioned already we can use just about any client want when fetching GraphQL data. Prisma's graphql-request is a simple and lightweight option, and that is what I’ve used here.

To do this, you will make use of a tool called GraphQL Codegen to generate TypeScript types based on the GraphQL schema Sanity provides. You will then use graphql-request to actually fetch the data.

What about https://github.com/prisma-labs/graphql-request that has 4.8k starts / 254 forks?

If you don't want to use Apollo, I suggest using codegen + graphql-request. There is a codegen plugin for graphql-request that auto generates a typesafe client sdk with all your queries as methods on the graphql-request client. Super clean and lightweight. https://github.com/prisma-labs/graphql-request

A Gatsby site uses Gatsby, which leverages React and GraphQL to create fast and optimized web experiences. Gatsby is often used for building static websites, progressive web apps (PWAs), and even full-blown dynamic web applications.

While Next.js is a powerful framework for building server-rendered React applications, it's not the only option for developers looking to create high-performance websites. One notable alternative is Gatsby, a static site generator that leverages React and GraphQL.

The other piece of important information to acknowledge here is that when we say RSCs need a framework, “framework” effectively just means “Next.js.” There are some smaller frameworks (like Waku) that support RSCs. There are also some larger and more established frameworks (like Redwood) that have plans to support RSCs or (like Gatsby) only support RSCs in beta. We will likely see this change once we get React 19 and RSCs are part of the Stable version. However, for now, Next.js is currently the only framework recommended in the official React docs that supports server components.

GatsbyjsCMS - Gatsby is the fast and flexible framework that makes building websites with any CMS, API, or database fun again. Build and deploy headless websites that drive more traffic, convert better, and earn more revenue!

GatsbyJS

Babel plugins are everywhere. From being used to remove unwanted exports from files in Gatsby to being used to disallow users from doing re-exports in Nextjs.

In terms of GitHub stars, SSGs like Next.js, Hugo, Gatsby, Docusaurus, Nuxt.js, and Jekyll top the list. Some popular SSGs even host conferences and workshops, providing resources and networking opportunities for those looking to explore more advanced topics in depth.

Flexibility : Developers have complete control over the frontend so they can use their preferred tools and frameworks like React, Next.js, Gatsby, or Remix.

Both Chakra UI and Shadcn supports reusable components and can be used with different frameworks like React, Gatsby, Next etc.