graphql-live-query VS graphql-spec

There are even more implementations of live queries available by now. e.g. https://github.com/samsarahq/thunder (go) or https://github.com/n1ru4l/graphql-live-query (JavaScript).

Please compare with modern competitor: json-patch-plus https://github.com/n1ru4l/graphql-live-query/blob/main/packa...

Also note that subscriptions are not the only way to do real time communications in GraphQL. There are also things like Live Queries with great libraries like this from Laurin which you can use

Last but not least, I also created a GraphQL over Socket.io (https://github.com/n1ru4l/graphql-live-query/tree/main/packages/socket-io-graphql-server) transport. I am using this in two smaller apps with a maximum of 10 concurrent users and did not encounter any issues with stale data yet. Maybe this might be somethign you are looking for.

So after having tried to answer you questions (instead of just telling you to not use WebSockets, although that wasn't your question 🙃). I also wanted to point you to a "new" way of handling real-time data with GraphQL that I am experimenting one. https://github.com/n1ru4l/graphql-live-query

There will always be an overhead for sending the mutations via a Post http request vs sending them over the already established WebSocket connection. graphql-ws is not only a subscription transport but can be used for any GraphQL operation including queries and mutations. In real-time applications I tend to use my own GraphQL over Socket.io transport (https://github.com/n1ru4l/graphql-live-query/tree/main/packages/socket-io-graphql-server)

GraphQL's first draft release was 8 years ago. [1]

It's first non-draft release was 5 years ago. [2]

It's first release under a community foundation was 2 years ago. [3]

[1] https://spec.graphql.org/July2015/

[2] https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/releases/tag/June201...

[3] https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/releases/tag/October...

I'm a big believer in GraphQL (in fact, at time of writing I'm #2 contributor to the GraphQL spec itself) so it pains me that a tool I built doesn't always have easy ways to achieve the "versionless schema" design that GraphQL encourages when it comes to making significant breaking changes to your underlying database tables. (Personally, I think you should aim for your database schema itself to be versionless, but this is not always possible.) Of course you can build your PostGraphile schema over views instead of tables, but views have their own problems that I won't go into here…

I created a proposal for Map type but didn’t make it through.

https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/pull/888

The issue with GraphQL is it tries to appease too many masters.

Similar to jsx. The language isn’t evolving.

The good thing is the spec is (almost) frozen, so there’s many implementations, the bad is it can encompass the flexibility of json schema can do.

Longer thread - Subscriptions RFC: Are Subscriptions and Live Queries the same thing?

https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/issues/284

You’ve probably figured it out by now, but for others who may be in a similar position; GraphQL is a specification (with various implementations) and you can read up on the spec here: https://spec.graphql.org/

If you're asking whether GraphQL supports anonymous objects that can be arbitrarily nested then no, it doesn't.

show this feature request some love https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/issues/174

* Performance: It's just hard to track down what makes an operation slow. The waterfall nature of resolvers is a big contributor

[1] https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/issues/488

:::note GraphQL Union is available for Types only, not for Inputs. However, the oneOf directive will bridge the gap in the future.