gp.nvim VS gptel

Here's one example: Today I used GPT-4 to write documentation for a Neovim plugin: https://github.com/Robitx/gp.nvim/pull/72/files

It may be a fancy Markov chain, but it seems to have understood the code it documented.

Update: Solved thanks to the u/geckothegeek42 nudge in the right direction.

Long story short - I didn't like available options, tried forking and bending, but eventually made one from scratch under MIT license => https://github.com/Robitx/gp.nvim

Emacs is able to run prompts, just like any other tool that's able to make an HTTP request. E.g., https://github.com/karthink/gptel provides hooks to both OpenAI and local LLMs, and allows you to use them anywhere—since everything in Emacs is a buffer.

There are some pretty great examples in the README.

Also worth checking out for more general use of LLMs in emacs: https://github.com/karthink/gptel

gptel: An LLM chat client for Emacs, supports ChatGPT and local LLMs (via Ollama, GPT4All or llama.cpp)

That would be great, though ChatGPT seems to prefer Markdown even when org is requested. Didn't want to fight it too much. Did you manage to get a reliable prompt, or if I'm understanding correctly gptel converts Markdown to Org?

I use https://github.com/karthink/gptel to talk to GPT in Emacs and, by extension, have a record of all my conversations (unless intentionally removed) as simple Org files in my single Org-Roam network.

It made me a working function on the first try. (sorry, I lost the exact prompt, I just ran gptel from my scratch buffer)