gopter VS rapid

Compare gopter vs rapid and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
gopter rapid
3 4
584 538
0.9% -
2.7 6.4
26 days ago 28 days ago
Go Go
MIT License Mozilla Public License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

gopter

Posts with mentions or reviews of gopter. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-12.
  • Property-Based Testing In Go
    2 projects | dev.to | 12 Jan 2022
    But others have found more ways to use this paradigm. If you want to learn more about property-based testing, then gopter, the GOlang Property TestER, is worth taking a look at. Amir Saeid, who’s good at this technique, recommends this book full of examples, and this blog.
    1 project | /r/golang | 26 Nov 2021
    I think gopter is more useful, for property-based testing.
  • Add experimental fuzz test support for Go 1.17
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Feb 2021
    Does anyone have experience with Gopter, a Golang Property Based testing library? https://github.com/leanovate/gopter

rapid

Posts with mentions or reviews of rapid. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-01.
  • Property based testing in Go
    1 project | dev.to | 1 Mar 2024
    You can check the package here, in official GitHub repo. I recently found this amazing testing framework and now I can't imagine developing tests without it. Let's try to refactor our previous example with this package:
  • Prefer table driven tests (2019)
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 1 Feb 2024
    Yes, but using quick is just a PITA, I'd recommend using Rapid https://github.com/flyingmutant/rapid instead
  • Why Turborepo is migrating from Go to Rust – Vercel
    7 projects | /r/golang | 8 Mar 2023
    For finite solutions that you can fit in your head maybe, but I'm still sure that fuzzing, coverage, and [advanced testing](https://github.com/flyingmutant/rapid) are ways to go. And nothing beats integration testing if you need to see how application interacts as a whole.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing gopter and rapid you can also consider the following projects:

go-fuzz - Randomized testing for Go

hopper - Coverage-Guided Greybox Distributed Fuzzer

diem - Diem’s mission is to build a trusted and innovative financial network that empowers people and businesses around the world.

base32h.rb - Base32H encoder/decoder in Ruby

go - The Go programming language

csvquote

trophy-case - 🏆 Collection of bugs uncovered by fuzzing Rust code